Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-6001

HIGH · 8.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
90/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the product image upload function of VirtueMart that bypasses the CSRF protection token. An attacker is able to craft a special CSRF request which will allow unrestricted file upload into the VirtueMart media manager.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A CSRF vulnerability in VirtueMart's product image upload function allows attackers to bypass the CSRF protection token mechanism. The attacker can craft malicious requests that bypass token validation, enabling unrestricted file upload to the media manager. This could allow uploading of executable files leading to remote code execution.

MitigationImplement robust CSRF token validation that cannot be bypassed, combined with strict server-side file type restrictions and content-type validation for the media upload function.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm VirtueMart installation
    Check for VirtueMart component files in the Joomla installation, typically under /administrator/components/com_virtuemart/ or /components/com_virtuemart/
    Affected if VirtueMart is installed and the product image upload feature is in use
  2. Identify VirtueMart version
    Locate the version file (typically version.php or manifest.xml in the VirtueMart component directory) and compare the version number against any known affected versions for CVE-2025-6001
    Affected if The installed version falls within the range affected by the CSRF bypass vulnerability
  3. Verify media manager upload endpoint accessibility
    Check if the product image upload URL (commonly /administrator/index.php?option=com_virtuemart&view=product) is accessible and exposes the upload functionality
    Affected if The upload function is exposed without proper access controls
  4. Inspect CSRF token validation in upload forms
    Examine the upload form's HTML source and the corresponding server-side validation code to determine if the token validation can be bypassed (look for conditional checks that may allow empty or malformed tokens)
    Affected if The CSRF token validation logic contains a bypass condition or fails to reject requests without valid tokens
  5. Check file type restrictions on uploads
    Review the server-side file upload handler for media manager to see if it enforces strict file type validation and blocks executable extensions
    Affected if The upload function allows file types other than images (e.g., .php, .phtml, .exe) without proper validation

A user is affected if VirtueMart is installed with an unpatched version that allows the product image upload CSRF check to be bypassed, permitting execution of arbitrary file uploads.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement robust CSRF token validation that cannot be bypassed, combined with strict server-side file type restrictions and content-type validation for the media upload function.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6001 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6001 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data