CVE-2025-60086
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in Matt WP Voting Contest wp-voting-contest allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects WP Voting Contest: from n/a through <= 5.8.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing Authorization vulnerability in the WP Voting Contest WordPress plugin allows unauthenticated or unauthorized users to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels, potentially allowing them to manipulate votes or access administrative functions they should not have permission to access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm WP Voting Contest plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins section and locate the WP Voting Contest plugin, or check the wp-content/plugins directory for the plugin folder. Note the installed version number.Affected if The plugin is installed and running without the latest security patch.
-
Identify voting-related endpointsReview the plugin's PHP files (typically in the plugin root) for action hooks handling vote submissions, such as wp_ajax_ or wp_ajax_nopriv_ hooks related to voting. Check for functions that process vote data without capability checks.Affected if The plugin exposes vote submission handlers accessible via wp_ajax_nopriv_ hooks without proper authorization validation.
-
Inspect admin function access controlsSearch plugin source code for admin-action functions (typically prefixed with admin_ or located in includes/admin folders). Verify that each function includes current_user_can() or similar capability checks before executing privileged operations.Affected if Administrative functions lack proper current_user_can() capability checks and are accessible to lower-privileged users or unauthenticated requests.
-
Check role configuration settingsLook for plugin options pages (usually under Settings menu) where role-based access controls for voting may be configured. Inspect stored options in wp_options table for any misconfigured permission settings.Affected if Role-based access settings are configured to grant excessive permissions to user roles that should not have voting manipulation access.
A user is affected if the WP Voting Contest plugin is installed with vulnerable authorization controls, specifically if vote submission endpoints are accessible without authentication or admin functions lack capability checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks and role-based access controls on all sensitive functions within the plugin, ensuring that user permissions are validated before allowing vote manipulation or administrative actions.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation5.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-60086 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-60086 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data