CVE-2025-60109
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in LambertGroup LambertGroup - AllInOne - Content Slider all-in-one-contentSlider allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects LambertGroup - AllInOne - Content Slider: from n/a through <= 3.8.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the LambertGroup AllInOne Content Slider WordPress plugin (version <= 3.8) allows unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via unsanitized input parameters, enabling blind SQL injection attacks for data exfiltration or database compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the installed version of AllInOne Content Slider pluginAccess your WordPress plugins admin panel or inspect the plugin header in the main plugin file to read the Version fieldAffected if The installed version number is 3.8 or lower (any version up to and including 3.8)
-
Locate database query code in the pluginExamine the plugin PHP files for database query functions such as $wpdb->get_results, $wpdb->query, or direct mysqli queriesAffected if Database query code exists in the plugin and the version is 3.8 or lower
-
Identify user input sources in SQL queriesSearch plugin code for any $_GET, $_POST, $_REQUEST, or $_COOKIE variables being used inside SQL query stringsAffected if User-controlled parameters from request variables appear directly inside SQL query strings without prepared statements or escaping functions
-
Test for blind SQL injection input vectorsIf user input is found in SQL queries, identify which specific parameters accept user data and could be manipulatedAffected if Any user-supplied parameter is concatenated directly into SQL without sanitization, enabling blind SQL injection attacks
-
Review access to vulnerable endpointsDetermine if the affected plugin functionality is accessible to unauthenticated users or only to logged-in administratorsAffected if The vulnerable SQL query code can be reached by unauthenticated users through frontend requests
The environment is affected if the AllInOne Content Slider plugin version is 3.8 or lower and any user-supplied input is passed directly into database queries without prepared statements or sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version of the plugin immediately; if unavailable, disable the plugin. Alternatively, implement parameterized queries and input validation at the application layer as a temporary mitigation.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-60109 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-60109 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data