CVE-2025-60111
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in javothemes Javo Core javo-core allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects Javo Core: from n/a through <= 3.0.0.266.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Javo Core theme allows authentication bypass. Attackers can potentially trick authenticated users into performing unintended actions or hijack their sessions by forcing malicious requests. The vulnerability affects all versions up to and including 3.0.0.266.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate Javo Core theme filesSearch the web server file system for the 'javo' directory in the themes folder (typically /wp-content/themes/ or similar path depending on the CMS installation).Affected if The javo theme directory exists on the server.
-
Identify the installed versionOpen the theme's style.css file (usually at /wp-content/themes/javo/style.css) and look for the 'Version:' header in the theme comments at the top of the file.Affected if The version listed is 3.0.0.266 or any lower version number.
-
Confirm the theme is activeCheck the CMS admin panel or database for active theme configuration. For WordPress, inspect the wp_options table for the 'template' or 'stylesheet' option value, or check via wp-admin > Appearance > Themes.Affected if Javo Core is set as the active/current theme.
-
Verify anti-CSRF protection is absentExamine the theme's PHP files for state-changing operations (forms, AJAX endpoints) and check whether they include anti-CSRF token validation (look for functions like wp_verify_nonce, check_ajax_referer, or custom token checks).Affected if No anti-CSRF token validation is found on form submissions or AJAX actions within the theme.
A user is affected if Javo Core theme version 3.0.266 or lower is installed and actively used without any external anti-CSRF mitigations in place.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all state-changing operations, add SameSite cookie attributes, and validate request referer headers. Update to a patched version once available.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-60111 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-60111 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data