CVE-2025-6015
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVault and Vault Enterprise’s (“Vault”) login MFA rate limits could be bypassed and TOTP tokens could be reused. Fixed in Vault Community Edition 1.20.1 and Vault Enterprise 1.20.1, 1.19.7, 1.18.12, and 1.16.23.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceVault's MFA implementation contained two flaws: rate limiting could be bypassed allowing unlimited MFA attempts, and TOTP tokens could be reused rather than being invalidated after single use. This enables both brute-force attacks against MFA codes and token replay attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.10.0, < 1.16.23>= 1.10.0, < 1.20.1>= 1.17.0, < 1.18.12>= 1.19.0, < 1.19.7= 1.20.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Vault versionRun 'vault version' on the Vault server host or query the /sys/health API endpoint. Compare the installed version against the affected ranges: < 1.16.23, < 1.18.12, < 1.19.7, or 1.20.0.Affected if The installed version falls within any affected range (1.10.0 to 1.16.22, 1.17.0 to 1.18.11, 1.19.0 to 1.19.6, or exactly 1.20.0).
-
Determine if MFA is enabledQuery Vault's MFA configuration via the API at /sys/mfa or use 'vault read sys/mfa' command to list MFA methods configured on any auth methods.Affected if MFA methods (such as TOTP, Okta, Duo, etc.) are configured and enforced on Vault authentication endpoints.
-
Review authentication logs for MFA anomaliesExamine Vault audit logs (stored in the configured audit log sink) for authentication events. Look for patterns such as: many failed MFA attempts from the same source IP, repeated submissions of the same TOTP code, or excessive authentication attempts without hitting rate limits.Affected if Logs show many MFA attempts from a single source without evidence of rate limiting enforcement, or the same TOTP code appears in multiple successful authentication events.
-
Check for TOTP token reuseSearch audit logs for duplicate TOTP codes used across different authentication sessions or timestamps. Compare timestamps and session IDs for identical TOTP values.Affected if The same TOTP code appears in multiple successful login events, indicating tokens are being reused rather than invalidated after single use.
You are affected if your Vault version is in the vulnerable range AND MFA is enabled, particularly if TOTP is used and logs show repeated token usage or unbounded MFA retry attempts.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.16.231.18.121.19.7
Upgrade to Vault Community Edition 1.20.1 or Vault Enterprise 1.20.1/1.19.7/1.18.12/1.16.23. Prioritize environments with exposed Vault login endpoints and enable authentication logging to detect unusual MFA attempt patterns.
Vault 1.20.1 (or 1.19.7/1.18.12/1.16.23 depending on your release branch)
- 1. Identify your current Vault version using `vault version`
- 2. Determine which release branch you're on (1.16.x, 1.18.x, 1.19.x, or 1.20.x)
- 3. Review the Vault upgrade guide at https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/upgrading
- 4. Create a backup of your Vault data directory and configuration
- 5. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first
- 6. Upgrade Vault to version 1.20.1 (or the latest patch for your branch: 1.19.7, 1.18.12, or 1.16.23)
- 7. Verify MFA functionality is working correctly after upgrade
- 8. Monitor Vault logs for any authentication-related errors
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,416.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6015 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6015 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data