CVE-2025-6017
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management through versions 2.10, before 2.10.7, 2.11, before 2.11.4, and 2.12, before 2.12.4. This vulnerability allows an unprivileged user to view confidential managed cluster credentials through the UI. This information should only be accessible to authorized users and may result in the loss of confidentiality of administrative information, which could be leaked to unauthorized actors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management contains an improper access control vulnerability where unprivileged users can view confidential managed cluster credentials through the web UI. The UI fails to properly enforce authorization checks, exposing sensitive administrative credentials that should be restricted to authorized administrators only.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.10, < 2.10.7>= 2.11, < 2.11.4>= 2.12, < 2.12.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the installed RHACM versionRun 'oc get csv -n open-cluster-management' or check the RHACM operator version in the Operator Hub. Compare the version number to the affected ranges: 2.10.x before 2.10.7, 2.11.x before 2.11.4, or 2.12.x before 2.12.4.Affected if The installed version falls within any of the affected version ranges listed.
-
Identify user roles with access to the RHACM web consoleRun 'oc get users' and 'oc get clusterrolebindings' to enumerate users and their assigned roles. Identify accounts that do not have administrator-level privileges.Affected if There are non-administrative users configured who can access the RHACM web console.
-
Test if unprivileged users can view managed cluster credentialsLog in to the RHACM web console as a non-admin user, navigate to the Clusters section, select a managed cluster, and check if the 'Credentials' tab or any credential information is visible and accessible without admin rights.Affected if Non-admin users can view managed cluster credentials (kubeconfig, SSH keys, pull secrets) through the web UI.
-
Verify API authorization on credential endpointsAs a non-admin user, attempt to query the RHACM API endpoint for cluster credentials (e.g., via 'oc get managedcluster <cluster-name> -o json' and check for exposed secret references) to confirm if authorization is bypassed.Affected if API responses include credential or secret data accessible to non-admin users.
You are affected if your RHACM version is 2.10.x < 2.10.7, 2.11.x < 2.11.4, or 2.12.x < 2.12.4 AND unprivileged users can view managed cluster credentials through the UI or API.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.10.72.11.42.12.4
Upgrade RHACM to version 2.10.7, 2.11.4, 2.12.4 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Verify that unauthorized users can no longer access managed cluster credentials through the UI.
Upgrade to ACM 2.10.7, 2.11.4, or 2.12.4 (whichever corresponds to your current release line; 2.12.4 is the latest stable release)
- Identify the currently installed version of Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
- Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on your current version (2.10.x -> 2.10.7, 2.11.x -> 2.11.4, or 2.12.x -> 2.12.4)
- Review the Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management upgrade documentation for your version
- Create a backup of your current ACM configuration and data
- Plan maintenance window as upgrade will require cluster downtime
- Execute the upgrade using the RHACM operator or OpenShift Container Platform operator lifecycle manager
- Verify the upgrade completed successfully by checking the ACM operator version
- Confirm the vulnerability is resolved by verifying unprivileged users can no longer access managed cluster credentials through the UI
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6017 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6017 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data