Everest Forms Frontend ListingWordPress extension · Wpeverest
CVE-2025-60210
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in wpeverest Everest Forms - Frontend Listing everest-forms-frontend-listing allows Object Injection.This issue affects Everest Forms - Frontend Listing: from n/a through <= 1.0.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA deserialization vulnerability in the Everest Forms - Frontend Listing plugin allows attackers to inject malicious PHP objects by supplying untrusted serialized data. This object injection can lead to code execution, file deletion, or other attacks depending on available PHP magic methods and the application's codebase.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Everest Forms Frontend ListingWordPress extension
<= 1.0.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm plugin installationNavigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and locate Everest Forms - Frontend Listing in the installed plugins list, or check the wp-content/plugins directory for the plugin folderAffected if The plugin is present in the WordPress installation
-
Identify installed versionIn WordPress admin > Plugins, click on Everest Forms - Frontend Listing to view the version details, or open the main plugin PHP file and read the Version field from the plugin header commentAffected if The installed version is 1.0.5 or lower
-
Check if Frontend Listing functionality is in useReview the website for frontend listing shortcodes or check plugin settings pages for active listings that expose the affected deserialization endpointAffected if The Frontend Listing feature is configured and publicly accessible
-
Review access logs for exploitation attemptsSearch web server access logs for requests containing serialized PHP data (such as O: or a: patterns) to known plugin endpoints, or look for PHP error logs showing unserialize() failuresAffected if Logs contain patterns indicative of deserialization attack attempts
The environment is affected if Everest Forms - Frontend Listing version 1.0.5 or lower is installed and the Frontend Listing feature is active and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Everest Forms - Frontend Listing to the latest patched version. If no patch is available, remove or disable the plugin and implement a WAF rule to block deserialization attacks on affected endpoints.
Fix this in Everest Forms Frontend Listing
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-60210 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-60210 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data