Deserialization of Untrusted DataWeakness · CWE-502

CVE-2025-60221

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in captivateaudio Captivate Sync captivatesync-trade allows Object Injection.This issue affects Captivate Sync: from n/a through <= 3.0.3.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Deserialization vulnerability in Captivate Sync allows attackers to inject malicious PHP objects through unsafe use of unserialize() on untrusted data. This PHP Object Injection can lead to remote code execution, file operations, or database manipulation depending on available gadget chains in the application environment.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of Captivate Sync; if no patch available, replace unsafe unserialize() calls with json_decode() and implement strict allowlist validation of input data.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Captivate Sync installation and version
    Locate the Captivate Sync installation directory and check for version files, typically in the main application folder or a VERSION/CHANGELOG file. Compare the found version against the vendor's release notes for patched versions.
    Affected if The installed version is older than the patched version released after the CVE publication date, or no version information is available.
  2. Search for unsafe unserialize() calls
    Scan the Captivate Sync source code for calls to PHP's unserialize() function, particularly in files handling user input, API endpoints, or data import features.
    Affected if Code contains unserialize() calls without prior sanitization or validation of the input data.
  3. Verify input source to unserialize() calls
    Trace the data flow from user-controlled sources (GET/POST parameters, cookies, file uploads, external API responses) to the identified unserialize() calls. Check if untrusted data reaches these calls directly.
    Affected if Untrusted or user-supplied data is passed directly to unserialize() without validation or transformation.
  4. Check for dangerous PHP gadget functions
    Search the application codebase for known PHP gadget chain components such as __destruct(), __wakeup(), __toString(), or calls to system/exec/shell_exec/passthru/file_put_contents that could be chained with the object injection.
    Affected if The application contains magic methods or dangerous file operations that could be triggered through PHP Object Injection.
  5. Inspect configuration for data processing endpoints
    Review Captivate Sync's configuration files and route definitions for endpoints that accept serialized data, such as sync, import, or webhook handlers.
    Affected if The application exposes endpoints that accept and process serialized data from external sources without validation.

If Captivate Sync is running and its codebase contains unserialize() calls that process untrusted input without validation, the environment is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection via this CVE.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of Captivate Sync; if no patch available, replace unsafe unserialize() calls with json_decode() and implement strict allowlist validation of input data.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-60221 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-60221 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data