CVE-2025-60234
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in designthemes Single Property single-property allows Object Injection.This issue affects Single Property: from n/a through <= 2.8.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA deserialization vulnerability in the designthemes Single Property WordPress plugin (versions <= 2.8) allows attackers to inject PHP objects by supplying untrusted serialized data, potentially leading to remote code execution if suitable magic methods or POP chains exist within the plugin or dependent libraries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the Single Property plugin installationCheck if the designthemes Single Property plugin is installed by looking for a folder named 'designthemes-single-property' or similar in the WordPress plugins directory (typically /wp-content/plugins/)Affected if The plugin folder exists in the WordPress plugins directory
-
Identify the installed plugin versionOpen the main plugin PHP file (often named single-property.php or similar) and look for the 'Version' header comment, or check the readme.txt file for the version numberAffected if The reported version is 2.8 or lower
-
Verify the plugin is activeIn the WordPress admin dashboard, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and check if the Single Property plugin is activatedAffected if The plugin shows as active in WordPress admin
-
Search for deserialization functions in plugin codeUse a file search or grep to look for 'unserialize' function calls within the plugin's PHP files, particularly in files that handle form submissions, AJAX requests, or API endpointsAffected if The plugin code contains unserialize() calls that process input from user-accessible sources (GET, POST, request parameters)
-
Check for exposed entry pointsExamine the plugin's AJAX handlers (usually in admin-ajax.php calls) or public-facing form handlers to see if they accept and process serialized data without validationAffected if The plugin accepts serialized data from unauthenticated or authenticated users and passes it to unserialize()
You are affected if the Single Property plugin version is 2.8 or lower, the plugin is active, and the vulnerable deserialization code is present and accessible to users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade the Single Property plugin to a version beyond 2.8 that includes proper input validation, or implement input sanitization to validate and reject untrusted data before deserialization.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-60234 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-60234 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data