CVE-2025-6024
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe authentication endpoint fails to encode user-supplied input before rendering it in the web page, allowing for script injection. An attacker can leverage this by injecting malicious scripts into the authentication endpoint. This can result in the user's browser being redirected to a malicious website, manipulation of the web page's user interface, or the retrieval of information from the browser. However, session hijacking is not possible due to the httpOnly flag protecting session-related cookies.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceReflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the authentication endpoint where user-supplied input is not properly encoded before being rendered in the response page. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript that executes in the victim's browser, enabling page redirection, UI manipulation, or sensitive data exfiltration via browser APIs.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.1.0= 3.2.0= 3.2.1= 4.0.0= 4.1.0= 5.10.0= 5.11.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm WSO2 product installationLocate the WSO2 installation directory. For API Manager, look for the 'wso2am' folder or check for 'wso2server.sh' or 'wso2server.bat' script. For Identity Server, look for 'wso2is' folder or 'wso2server' script. Check for the presence of 'repository/components' directory containing the product binaries.Affected if The product is WSO2 API Manager 3.1.0, 3.2.0, 3.2.1, 4.0.0, or 4.1.0; OR WSO2 Identity Server 5.10.0 or 5.11.0
-
Determine installed product versionOpen the 'repository/components/plugins' directory and locate the core JAR file (typically 'org.wso2.carbon.core_*.jar'). Alternatively, check the 'carbon.xml' configuration file in 'repository/conf' for the 'ServerVersion' property. You can also view the product splash page or check the 'product-version' in the server startup logs.Affected if The installed version matches exactly: 3.1.0, 3.2.0, 3.2.1, 4.0.0, or 4.1.0 for API Manager; or 5.10.0 or 5.11.0 for Identity Server
-
Verify authentication endpoint is accessibleAccess the default authentication endpoint URL. For API Manager, this is typically 'https://<host>:9443/authenticationendpoint/login.do'. For Identity Server, it is typically 'https://<host>:9443/login.do'. Confirm the endpoint responds with a login page.Affected if The authentication endpoint is exposed and accessible, meaning user input can be submitted to this endpoint
-
Check for XSS vulnerability in authentication endpointSend a crafted request to the authentication endpoint with a test payload in the query parameters (such as '<script>alert(1)</script>') and inspect the response HTML to see if the payload is reflected without proper encoding. Use browser developer tools or a proxy to view the raw HTTP response.Affected if User-supplied input in authentication endpoint parameters is reflected in the response without HTML encoding (unescaped '<' and '>' characters visible in the page source)
You are affected if you have WSO2 API Manager (exact versions 3.1.0, 3.2.0, 3.2.1, 4.0.0, 4.1.0) or WSO2 Identity Server (exact versions 5.10.0, 5.11.0) installed AND the authentication endpoint is accessible and reflects user input without encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper output encoding/escaping for all user-supplied data rendered in HTML context at the authentication endpoint. Apply context-appropriate encoding (HTML, URL, JavaScript) based on where the data is inserted into the page.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6024 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6024 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data