Improper Privilege ManagementWeakness · CWE-269

CVE-2025-6042

HIGH · 7.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-15
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
82/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Lisfinity Core - Lisfinity Core plugin used for pebas® Lisfinity WordPress theme plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.0. This is due to the plugin assigning the editor role by default. While limitations with respect to capabilities are put in place, use of the API is not restricted. This vulnerability can be leveraged together with CVE-2025-6038 to obtain admin privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Lisfinity Core WordPress plugin assigns the editor role by default to users, creating a privilege escalation vector. Although capability limitations exist, the plugin fails to restrict API access, allowing unprivileged users to potentially perform actions beyond their intended permissions. This can be chained with CVE-2025-6038 to achieve full administrator access.

MitigationUpdate the plugin to a version beyond 1.4.0 that removes the default editor role assignment and implements proper API access controls with authentication checks. Until a fix is available, disable the plugin or restrict user registration.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Lisfinity Core plugin is installed
    In WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Lisfinity Core' or check the plugins directory via file system for /wp-content/plugins/lisfinity-core/
    Affected if The plugin is present in the WordPress installation
  2. Check installed plugin version
    In WordPress admin Plugins page, find Lisfinity Core and note the version number displayed, or inspect the main plugin file header for 'Version:' field
    Affected if Version is 1.4.0 or lower (versions beyond 1.4.0 contain the fix)
  3. Confirm WordPress user registration is enabled
    In WordPress admin, go to Settings > General and check 'Anyone can register' setting, or query the database: SELECT option_value FROM wp_options WHERE option_name = 'users_can_register'
    Affected if User registration is enabled (value = 1)
  4. Identify unexpected editor-level users
    Query users with editor role: In WordPress admin under Users > All Users, filter by 'Editor' role, or query: SELECT user_id, meta_value FROM wp_usermeta WHERE meta_key = 'wp_capabilities' AND meta_value LIKE '%editor%'
    Affected if There are editor users who did not receive that role intentionally from an administrator

A user is affected if Lisfinity Core plugin is installed with version 1.4.0 or lower AND WordPress user registration is enabled, allowing potential privilege escalation via unintended editor role assignment and unrestricted API access.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update the plugin to a version beyond 1.4.0 that removes the default editor role assignment and implements proper API access controls with authentication checks. Until a fix is available, disable the plugin or restrict user registration.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
19.0 hours of engineering $3,380
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6042 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6042 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data