CVE-2025-60571
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedD-Link DIR600LAx FW116WWb01 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the curTime parameter in the function formSetQoS.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the D-Link DIR600LAx router firmware (FW116WWb01) within the formSetQoS function. The curTime parameter fails to properly validate input length before copying data into a fixed-size buffer, allowing an attacker to overwrite adjacent memory and potentially achieve remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.16wwb01CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the router modelAccess the router's web administration interface and check the device info page, or use Nmap to fingerprint the device and check the HTTP server header for 'DIR-600L' or similar D-Link identifiersAffected if The device is not a D-Link DIR-600LAx router - different models are not affected by this specific CVE
-
Check the installed firmware versionLog into the router's web interface and navigate to Status or System Info page to view the firmware version, or use the router's hidden status page (usually /dev_status.asp or similar) to retrieve version infoAffected if The firmware version is NOT 1.16wwb01 - only this specific version is listed as affected
-
Verify the web management interface is exposedAttempt to access the router's HTTP/HTTPS management interface from the network segment you are assessing - check if TCP ports 80 or 443 are listening and reachableAffected if The web interface is accessible from an untrusted network - exploitation requires sending crafted requests to the formSetQoS function via the web interface
-
Confirm QoS feature configurationLog into the router and navigate to the QoS settings page (usually under Advanced or Bandwidth Management) to verify if Quality of Service settings are configurableAffected if The QoS feature is present and accessible - the vulnerable formSetQoS function handles QoS parameter processing, though the function exists regardless of whether QoS is actively used
A user is affected if they have a D-Link DIR-600LAx router running firmware version 1.16wwb01 with the web management interface accessible on their network, as the buffer overflow in formSetQoS can be triggered via the curTime parameter in QoS configuration requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedRestrict access to the device's web management interface to trusted networks only. Given the router is end-of-life with no official patch available, replace the device with a currently supported model. If replacement is not feasible, implement network segmentation and monitor for exploitation attempts.
D-Link DIR-600L latest available firmware (check support.dlink.com for version newer than 1.16wwb01)
- 1. Identify the current firmware version of the D-Link DIR-600L router by accessing the web management interface at http://192.168.0.1 and checking the Status or Management section.
- 2. Navigate to the D-Link support page for the DIR-600L model (support.dlink.com) and locate the firmware download section.
- 3. Download the latest available firmware version for the DIR-600L from D-Link's official support website.
- 4. In the router's web management interface, go to the Tools or System section and locate the Firmware Upgrade option.
- 5. Upload the downloaded firmware file and wait for the upgrade process to complete - do not power off the router during this process.
- 6. After the router restarts, verify the new firmware version is installed and test that the QoS functionality still works correctly.
- 7. If no newer firmware is available from D-Link, consider replacing the device as it may be end-of-life.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation20.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,864.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-60571 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-60571 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data