CVE-2025-60703
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUntrusted pointer dereference in Windows Remote Desktop allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA memory safety vulnerability exists in Windows Remote Desktop where an untrusted pointer is dereferenced, allowing a locally authenticated attacker to elevate privileges to SYSTEM level by exploiting the pointer handling logic in the Remote Desktop service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.8594< 10.0.17763.8027< 10.0.19044.6575< 10.0.19045.6575< 10.0.22631.6199< 10.0.26100.7092< 10.0.26200.7092all versions= r2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Windows version and build numberOpen Command Prompt or PowerShell and run 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to get the exact Windows version and build numberAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: Windows 10 1607 < 10.0.14393.8594, Windows 10 1809 < 10.0.17763.8027, Windows 10 21h2 < 10.0.19044.6575, Windows 10 22h2 < 10.0.19045.6575, Windows 11 23h2 < 10.0.22631.6199, Windows 11 24h2 < 10.0.26100.7092, Windows 11 25h2 < 10.0.26200.7092,
-
Check if Remote Desktop service is presentOpen Services console (services.msc) or run 'sc query TermService' in Command Prompt to check if the Remote Desktop Services service (TermService) exists on the systemAffected if The TermService service exists on the system (the vulnerability is in the Remote Desktop code path regardless of whether RDP is enabled for remote connections)
-
Verify installed security updatesOpen Control Panel > Programs > Programs and Features > View installed updates, or run 'Get-HotFix | Sort-Object InstalledOn -Descending | Select-Object -First 10' in PowerShell to list recent security patchesAffected if No Microsoft security update for CVE-2025-60703 is listed among installed updates
A system is affected if it runs any Windows version listed in the affected ranges AND has the Remote Desktop service component present, and the CVE-2025-60703 security update has not been installed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.859410.0.17763.802710.0.19044.6575
Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2025-60703 via Windows Update or enterprise patch management systems to address the untrusted pointer dereference in Remote Desktop.
Windows 10 1607: 10.0.14393.8594 or later | Windows 10 1809: 10.0.17763.8027 or later | Windows 10 21h2: 10.0.19044.6575 or later | Windows 10 22h2: 10.0.19045.6575 or later | Windows 11 23h2: 10.0.22631.6199 or later | Windows 11 24h2: 10.0.26100.7092 or later | Windows 11 25h2: 10.0.26200.7092 or
- Open Windows Settings and navigate to Update & Security > Windows Update
- Click 'Check for updates' to download and install the latest security updates
- Alternatively, manually install the security update from Microsoft Catalog for your specific Windows version: KB5055528 for Windows 10 1607, KB5055518 for Windows 10 1809, KB5055523 for Windows 10 21h2/22h2, KB5055527 for Windows 11 23h2/24h2/25h2
- For Windows Server 2008/R2, this is End of Life - migrate to a supported Windows Server version or apply the last available security updates if still under Extended Support
- Restart the system after applying updates
- Verify the installed security update by running 'winver' or checking installed updates
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-60703 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-60703 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data