CVE-2025-60720
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer over-read in Windows TDX.sys allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceBuffer over-read vulnerability in Windows TDX.sys kernel driver enables a locally authorized attacker to read beyond allocated buffer boundaries, potentially exposing sensitive kernel memory and achieving privilege escalation to SYSTEM level.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.8594< 10.0.17763.8027< 10.0.19044.6575< 10.0.19045.6575< 10.0.22631.6199< 10.0.26100.7092< 10.0.26200.7092all versions= r2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if TDX.sys driver existsOpen File Explorer and navigate to C:\Windows\System32\drivers\tdx.sys, or run: dir C:\Windows\System32\drivers\tdx.sysAffected if File does not exist - the vulnerability does not apply because the TDX driver is not installed on this system
-
Get TDX.sys file versionRight-click tdx.sys in File Explorer, select Properties, go to Details tab and note the File version field; or run: wmic datafile where "name='C:\\Windows\\System32\\drivers\\tdx.sys'" get VersionAffected if The version shown is lower than the version in the affected ranges for your Windows build (10.0.14393.8594, 10.0.17763.8027, 10.0.19044.6575, 10.0.19045.6575, 10.0.22631.6199, 10.0.26100.7092, or 10.0.26200.7092 depending on your Windows version)
-
Verify Windows version and buildRun winver or go to Settings > System > About to find your Windows version and build numberAffected if Your Windows build number is lower than the fix version for your specific Windows release (see the affected version list for your Windows 10/11 or Server version)
-
Check if TDX driver service is presentRun: sc query tdx or Get-Service -Name TDX in PowerShellAffected if Service state shows as running or stopped - the vulnerable driver component is present on this system
You are affected if TDX.sys is present on your system AND your Windows version/build is lower than the corresponding fix version for your Windows release.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.859410.0.17763.802710.0.19044.6575
Apply the Microsoft security update for TDX.sys once released; prioritize patching on systems where local unprivileged users have access, as exploitation requires local access but not administrator privileges.
Install the latest Windows security updates for your Windows version; fixed builds are: Windows 10 1607: 10.0.14393.8594+, Windows 10 1809: 10.0.17763.8027+, Windows 10 21h2: 10.0.19044.6575+, Windows 10 22h2: 10.0.19045.6575+, Windows 11 23h2: 10.0.22631.6199+, Windows 11 24h2: 10.0.26100.7092+, Wi
- Identify the current Windows build version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' from command prompt
- Open Windows Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update
- Click 'Check for updates' to download and install the latest security updates from Microsoft
- Alternatively, manually download the specific KB update for this CVE from the Microsoft Update Catalog (search by CVE number)
- Restart the system after updates are installed
- Verify the build number matches or exceeds the fixed version for your Windows release (e.g., for Windows 10 22h2, verify build is 10.0.19045.6575 or higher)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-60720 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-60720 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data