Insufficiently Protected CredentialsWeakness · CWE-522

CVE-2025-6081

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-07-01
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Insufficiently Protected Credentials in LDAP in Konica Minolta bizhub 227 Multifunction printers version GCQ-Y3 or earlier allows an attacker can reconfigure the target device to use an external LDAP service controlled by the attacker. If an LDAP password is set on the target device, the attacker can force the target device to authenticate to the attacker controlled LDAP service. This will allow the attacker to capture the plaintext password of the configured LDAP service.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The bizhub 227 printer has an LDAP credential vulnerability where an attacker can reconfigure the device to use an attacker-controlled LDAP server. If an LDAP password is configured on the device, the attacker forces authentication to their server, capturing the plaintext LDAP password in transit.

MitigationUpdate the device firmware to a version newer than GCQ-Y3, disable LDAP authentication if unnecessary, and change any potentially compromised LDAP passwords immediately. Restrict network access to the printer management interface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm device model is bizhub 227
    Access the printer web interface or print a configuration page to verify the exact model number matches bizhub 227
    Affected if Device model is bizhub 227 and LDAP authentication features are in use
  2. Check firmware version
    Access the printer admin panel, typically at the device IP address, and navigate to the firmware or system information section to locate the installed firmware version
    Affected if Firmware version is GCQ-Y3 or earlier (or if version cannot be determined but is older than current release)
  3. Verify LDAP is enabled
    In the printer management interface, navigate to the LDAP or authentication settings section and confirm whether LDAP authentication or LDAP address book functionality is turned on
    Affected if LDAP authentication or LDAP address book is enabled on the device
  4. Inspect LDAP server configuration
    In the LDAP settings area, examine the configured LDAP server hostname or IP address to determine if it points to an expected internal server or an unrecognized external location
    Affected if The configured LDAP server address is unknown, external, or differs from your organization's legitimate LDAP server
  5. Check LDAP credentials are stored
    In the LDAP configuration panel, verify if an LDAP bind password or authentication password field contains a saved credential (note: some interfaces may display masked characters)
    Affected if An LDAP password is configured or stored on the device for authentication purposes

The device is likely affected if it is a bizhub 227 with firmware at or before GCQ-Y3 and has LDAP authentication enabled with a configured password pointing to any LDAP server.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update the device firmware to a version newer than GCQ-Y3, disable LDAP authentication if unnecessary, and change any potentially compromised LDAP passwords immediately. Restrict network access to the printer management interface.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6081 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6081 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data