CVE-2025-6082
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Birth Chart Compatibility plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Full Path Disclosure in all versions up to, and including, 2.0. This is due to insufficient protection against directly accessing the plugin's index.php file, which causes an error exposing the full path. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the full path of the web application, which can be used to aid other attacks. The information displayed is not useful on its own, and requires another vulnerability to be present for damage to an affected website.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Birth Chart Compatibility WordPress plugin (versions up to 2.0) contains a Full Path Disclosure vulnerability where directly accessing the plugin's index.php file triggers a PHP error that exposes the full server filesystem path. This occurs due to missing access control (typically a `defined('ABSPATH')` check) at the beginning of the file, allowing unauthenticated attackers to obtain sensitive path information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the plugin installation directoryCheck your WordPress plugins folder (typically wp-content/plugins/) for a directory named 'birth-chart-compatibility' or similar variant. Verify the exact folder name used by the plugin.Affected if The plugin directory exists in the WordPress plugins folder
-
Identify the installed plugin versionOpen the main plugin file (usually birth-chart-compatibility.php or similar) and look for the version declaration in the plugin header comment, or check readme.txt for the Version field. Compare against version 2.0 or lower.Affected if Installed version is 2.0 or lower (including unversioned releases)
-
Verify the index.php file existsCheck the plugin directory for an index.php file. This file is the entry point that can be directly accessed and triggers the path disclosure.Affected if The index.php file exists within the plugin directory
-
Inspect index.php for ABSPATH access guardOpen the plugin's index.php file and examine the first few lines (within the first 5 lines). Look for a line containing 'defined(' and 'ABSPATH' (e.g., 'defined(ABSPATH) || exit;'). If this guard is missing, the file is vulnerable.Affected if The ABSPATH guard is absent from the beginning of index.php (no 'defined(ABSPATH)' check present)
-
Test for path disclosure (optional manual verification)If you have CLI access, attempt to execute the index.php file directly via PHP from the web server context or simulate a direct request. A vulnerable file will output a PHP error message containing the full server filesystem path.Affected if Direct access produces a PHP error revealing the full server path
You are affected if the Birth Chart Compatibility plugin (version 2.0 or lower) is installed AND the index.php file lacks the defined('ABSPATH') guard, allowing full path disclosure when accessed directly.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataAdd a WordPress access control guard (e.g., `defined('ABSPATH') || exit;`) at the top of the plugin's index.php file to prevent direct execution. Alternatively, remove or rename the index.php file if not required for plugin functionality.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6082 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6082 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data