McmsApplication · Mingsoft

CVE-2025-60838

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 6.0.1 or later.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An arbitrary file upload vulnerability in MCMS v6.0.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via uploading a crafted file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

MCMS v6.0.1 contains an arbitrary file upload vulnerability that allows attackers to upload crafted files and achieve arbitrary code execution. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file types or sanitize filenames, allowing malicious executables to be stored in a location where they can be accessed and executed by the web server.

MitigationImmediately restrict or disable file upload functionality until a patch is available. Implement strict allowlist-based file type validation, sanitize filenames, store uploads outside the webroot, and prevent direct execution of uploaded files.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
McmsApplication
Affected:<= 6.0.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify MCMS installation and version
    Locate the MCMS application files and check the version identifier in the deployed package, build file, or application metadata. Common locations include pom.xml, package.json, or a version configuration file in the installation directory.
    Affected if The installed version is Mingsoft Mcms at 6.0.1 or any earlier version.
  2. Verify file upload functionality exists
    Locate the file upload feature in the web application. This is typically found in content management pages, media libraries, or user profile sections. Check the application's routing or controller mappings for endpoints that handle multipart file uploads.
    Affected if File upload functionality is present and accessible to users or administrators in the application.
  3. Inspect uploaded file storage location
    Examine the application configuration or code to determine where uploaded files are stored. Look for upload directories defined in configuration files or application code. Verify whether this directory is within the webroot (webapps, public, or similar) and directly accessible via HTTP.
    Affected if Uploaded files are stored in a directory that is web-accessible and can be reached via a direct URL.
  4. Check file type validation implementation
    Review the file upload handler code or configuration to determine what validation is performed on uploaded files. Look for checks on file extensions, MIME types, or file content (magic bytes). Examine whether a strict allowlist is used versus a blocklist.
    Affected if There is no strict allowlist-based validation, or the validation can be easily bypassed (missing or weak).
  5. Verify filename sanitization
    Examine how uploaded filenames are processed. Check if filenames are sanitized to remove or encode special characters, or if the original filename from the request is used directly when saving files.
    Affected if Filenames are used as-is without sanitization, allowing path traversal characters or executable extensions.

Your environment is affected if you are running Mingsoft Mcms version 6.0.1 or earlier and the application has an accessible file upload feature that stores files in a web-accessible location without strict validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 6.0.1
Interim mitigation

Immediately restrict or disable file upload functionality until a patch is available. Implement strict allowlist-based file type validation, sanitize filenames, store uploads outside the webroot, and prevent direct execution of uploaded files.

Fix this in Mcms Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,780
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,848.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-60838 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-60838 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data