CVE-2025-60982
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIDOR vulnerability in Educare ERP 1.0 (2025-04-22) allows unauthorized access to sensitive data via manipulated object references. Affected endpoints do not enforce proper authorization checks, allowing authenticated users to access or modify data belonging to other users by changing object identifiers in API requests. Attackers can exploit this flaw to view or modify sensitive records without proper authorization.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIDOR vulnerability in Educare ERP 1.0 allows authenticated users to access or modify data belonging to other users by manipulating object identifiers (such as record IDs) in API requests. Affected endpoints fail to validate that the requesting user has permission to access the specific object, enabling unauthorized cross-user data access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Educare ERP installation and versionLocate the Educare ERP installation directory or check the application startup/version information. Look for files like version.php, about.php, or check the database for version records.Affected if The installed version is Educare ERP 1.0 exactly, as the affected version range is limited to this version.
-
Identify API endpoints in the applicationSearch the Educare ERP source code for API-related directories or files (e.g., /api/, api.php, endpoints, routes). Also check for AJAX handlers used for data operations.Affected if API endpoints exist and are accessible to authenticated users.
-
Verify authentication is required for API accessAttempt to access identified API endpoints without providing credentials, or examine the code to see if authentication checks are performed before processing requests.Affected if API endpoints require authentication but do not perform object-level authorization checks.
-
Examine API parameter handling for object identifiersReview the API code to identify parameters that accept record IDs, user IDs, or other object references (e.g., ?id=123, ?user_id=456). Check if these IDs are used directly in database queries without ownership validation.Affected if API endpoints accept object identifiers as parameters and use them in queries without verifying the requesting user owns or has permission to access that object.
-
Check for authorization logic in data retrieval functionsSearch the codebase for authorization or ownership validation functions that should be called before returning user data. Look for patterns like 'WHERE user_id = current_user' in SQL queries within API handlers.Affected if Data retrieval queries lack user-specific WHERE clauses or permission checks, allowing cross-user data access by manipulating IDs.
A user is affected if they have Educare ERP 1.0 running with accessible API endpoints that accept object identifiers without validating that the authenticated user owns or has permission to access the requested data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks on all API endpoints to verify that the authenticated user has permission to access or modify the specific object before returning or altering data. Use indirect object references and enforce ownership validation.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,720.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-60982 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-60982 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data