Command InjectionWeakness · CWE-77

CVE-2025-6102

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Wifi-soft UniBox Controller up to 20250506. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /authentication/logout.php. The manipulation of the argument mac_address leads to os command injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

OS command injection vulnerability in Wifi-soft UniBox Controller's /authentication/logout.php endpoint. The mac_address parameter is not properly sanitized before being used in a system command, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands. A public exploit exists.

MitigationUntil vendor provides a patch, implement defense-in-depth: block the affected endpoint at the WAF/IPS layer, restrict network access to the management interface, and consider disabling the logout functionality if feasible. Alternatively, manually patch the logout.php to use parameterized calls or input validation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Wifi-soft UniBox Controller is installed
    Identify the installed product by reviewing web server response headers, title tags, or consulting inventory systems for 'UniBox Controller' or 'Wifi-soft' software
    Affected if The system is running Wifi-soft UniBox Controller
  2. Verify logout.php endpoint exists
    Check if /authentication/logout.php is accessible on the management interface (e.g., curl -s http://target/authentication/logout.php)
    Affected if The endpoint returns a valid HTTP response rather than a 404
  3. Inspect logout.php for unsafe command execution
    Review the source code of logout.php if accessible, looking for system(), exec(), shell_exec(), or passthru() calls that incorporate the mac_address parameter without sanitization
    Affected if The code uses mac_address in a shell command without parameterized queries or input validation
  4. Check if management interface is network exposed
    Review firewall rules or network access lists to determine if the UniBox management interface (typically ports 80/443) is reachable from untrusted networks
    Affected if The management interface is accessible from outside trusted networks without authentication barrier
  5. Verify no WAF/IPS rule blocks the logout endpoint
    Review WAF or IPS configurations to confirm whether /authentication/logout.php or parameter-based requests are being blocked or sanitized
    Affected if No protective rule exists and the endpoint remains directly accessible

The environment is affected if it runs Wifi-soft UniBox Controller with the logout.php endpoint accessible and the mac_address parameter processed in an unsafe manner within system commands.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Until vendor provides a patch, implement defense-in-depth: block the affected endpoint at the WAF/IPS layer, restrict network access to the management interface, and consider disabling the logout functionality if feasible. Alternatively, manually patch the logout.php to use parameterized calls or input validation.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
21.0 hours of engineering $3,680
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6102 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6102 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data