CVE-2025-61306
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA reflected cross-site scripted (XSS) vulnerability in the dfm-menu_coveragealerts.php component of GmbH Mecury Managed Print Services (docuForm) v11.11c allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of a user's browser via injecting a crafted payload into an unfiltered variable value.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the dfm-menu_coveragealerts.php component of GmbH Mecury Managed Print Services (docuForm) v11.11c. The vulnerability allows attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript payloads through an unfiltered variable that gets reflected back to the user's browser, enabling execution of malicious scripts in the context of a victim's session.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm docuForm product installationLocate the Mecury Managed Print Services (docuForm) installation directory or check web server document root for docuForm application filesAffected if The product is not installed or is a version different from v11.11c
-
Verify the affected versionCheck the installed version of docuForm against v11.11c. Consult the application's about page, version file, or admin interface for version informationAffected if The installed version is v11.11c (other versions are not affected by this specific CVE)
-
Locate the vulnerable component fileSearch for the file named 'dfm-menu_coveragealerts.php' within the docuForm web directory structureAffected if The file dfm-menu_coveragealerts.php exists in the docuForm installation
-
Check if the component is web-accessibleAttempt to access the file via HTTP/HTTPS request (e.g., https://your-server/path/dfm-menu_coveragealerts.php) or verify through web server configuration that it is publicly or internally reachableAffected if The file is accessible via web request, making the XSS exploitable
You are affected if the docuForm version is exactly v11.11c and the dfm-menu_coveragealerts.php file exists and is web-accessible, as the unfiltered variable in that component will reflect malicious script payloads back to the user.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied variables in the affected component. Use context-appropriate escaping (e.g., HTML encoding for reflected content) or employ a security-focused input sanitization library to neutralize malicious payload patterns.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-61306 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-61306 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data