CVE-2025-61307
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA reflected cross-site scripted (XSS) vulnerability in the acc-menu_papers.php component of GmbH Mecury Managed Print Services (docuForm) v11.11c allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of a user's browser via injecting a crafted payload into an unfiltered variable value.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the acc-menu_papers.php component of GmbH Mercury Managed Print Services (docuForm) v11.11c. The vulnerability allows attackers to inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim's browser by submitting a crafted payload through an unfiltered variable, likely a GET or POST parameter that is reflected back in the HTTP response without proper output encoding.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the vulnerable PHP fileSearch the web server document root for acc-menu_papers.php. Common paths include /var/www/html/, /www/, or the application's web root directory. Use: find /var/www -name "acc-menu_papers.php" 2>/dev/nullAffected if The file exists on the server and is served by the web application
-
Identify the docuForm versionCheck the application version from the product itself, configuration files, or the application header/footer. Common locations include version info in the login page, a config file in the application root, or the software itself reporting its version.Affected if The installed version is v11.11c or falls within the affected range around this version
-
Determine if the file is web-accessibleAttempt to access the file via HTTP/HTTPS: http://[target]/acc-menu_papers.php or the full path if discovered in step 1. A 200 response confirms the component is exposed.Affected if The file returns a 200 OK response, meaning the vulnerable component is exposed to users
-
Verify unfiltered parameter reflection existsReview the acc-menu_papers.php source code for GET or POST parameters that are echoed or printed back to the user without sanitization functions like htmlspecialchars(), htmlentities(), or similar output encoding.Affected if The code contains parameters (e.g., from $_GET or $_POST) that are directly output without encoding, enabling reflected XSS
A user is affected if docuForm v11.11c is installed, the acc-menu_papers.php file exists and is web-accessible, and user-supplied parameters are reflected in the response without output encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement robust input validation and output encoding on all user-supplied data within acc-menu_papers.php. Additionally, deploy a Content Security Policy (CSP) header to mitigate XSS execution even if injection occurs.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-61307 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-61307 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data