Cross-site Scripting (XSS)Weakness · CWE-79

CVE-2025-61309

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A reflected cross-site scripted (XSS) vulnerability in the dfm-menu_departments.php component of GmbH Mecury Managed Print Services (docuForm) v11.11c allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of a user's browser via injecting a crafted payload into an unfiltered variable value.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the dfm-menu_departments.php component of GmbH Mercury Managed Print Services (docuForm) v11.11c. The vulnerability stems from an unfiltered variable that accepts user input without proper sanitization, allowing attackers to inject malicious JavaScript payloads that execute in the context of a victim's browser.

MitigationImplement proper input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied variables in dfm-menu_departments.php, utilizing context-appropriate escaping functions (e.g., htmlspecialchars) to neutralize script injection attempts.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the vulnerable script file
    Search the web server document root for the file dfm-menu_departments.php. Common paths may include /, /menu/, /includes/, or /admin/ directories. Use: find /var/www -name 'dfm-menu_departments.php' 2>/dev/null
    Affected if The file exists in the web application directory tree
  2. Confirm the docuForm version
    Check the installed version of Mercury Managed Print Services (docuForm). Look in version files, about pages, or the application header/footer for a version string like 'v11.11c'. If no version file exists, check the application software metadata or contact the vendor.
    Affected if The installed version is 11.11c or if the version cannot be determined but the vulnerable file exists
  3. Inspect the vulnerable code for unsanitized input
    Examine dfm-menu_departments.php for any $_GET, $_POST, or $_REQUEST parameters that are used in the page output without passing through sanitization functions such as htmlspecialchars, strip_tags, or a proper encoding function. Search for patterns like 'echo $_GET' or 'print $_REQUEST' that output user data directly.
    Affected if User-supplied parameters are output directly to the page without sanitization
  4. Test for reflected XSS vulnerability
    If the file is accessible via HTTP, send a request with a test payload in suspected parameters, such as ?param=<script>alert(1)</script> or similar. Observe whether the payload is reflected back in the response without encoding. Use browser developer tools or a proxy to inspect the response.
    Affected if The test payload is reflected in the response HTML without being escaped or encoded

A user is affected if the dfm-menu_departments.php file exists in their docuForm v11.11c installation and contains user input being reflected to the page output without sanitization functions.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied variables in dfm-menu_departments.php, utilizing context-appropriate escaping functions (e.g., htmlspecialchars) to neutralize script injection attempts.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-61309 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-61309 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data