CVE-2025-61656
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Wikimedia Foundation VisualEditor. This vulnerability is associated with program files src/ce/ve.Ce.ClipboardHandler.Js. This issue affects VisualEditor: from * before 1.39.14, 1.43.4, 1.44.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in VisualEditor's clipboard handler (ve.Ce.ClipboardHandler.js) allows improper handling of clipboard input that could be rendered without proper sanitization, potentially executing malicious scripts in user browsers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.39.0, < 1.39.14>= 1.43.0, < 1.43.4= 1.44.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the VisualEditor extension directoryFind the VisualEditor extension folder in your MediaWiki installation (typically under /extensions/VisualEditor or similar). Identify the version by checking composer.json, extension.json, or a VERSION file within that directory.Affected if Cannot locate the extension or version file indicates an unknown variant.
-
Determine the installed VisualEditor versionRead the version number from the extension's version file or package definition. Note the exact version string (for example, 1.43.0, 1.44.0, 1.39.5).Affected if The version cannot be determined or the extension is not installed.
-
Compare version against affected rangesCheck if the installed version falls into any of these ranges: 1.39.0 through 1.39.13, 1.43.0 through 1.43.3, or exactly 1.44.0. These are the vulnerable versions.Affected if Installed version is >= 1.39.0 and < 1.39.14, OR >= 1.43.0 and < 1.43.4, OR equals 1.44.0.
-
Verify VisualEditor is enabledCheck your MediaWiki configuration file (LocalSettings.php) for the line 'wfLoadExtension( 'VisualEditor' )' or similar enablement. Confirm the extension is actively loaded.Affected if VisualEditor is enabled and the version falls into the affected ranges.
-
Confirm the vulnerable clipboard handler file existsLocate the file ve.Ce.ClipboardHandler.js within the VisualEditor extension directory structure (typically under /modules/ve-ce/). The presence of this file indicates the vulnerable component is present.Affected if The file exists and the extension version is in the affected ranges listed above.
Your environment is affected if VisualEditor is enabled and the installed version is any of: 1.39.0-1.39.13, 1.43.0-1.43.3, or 1.44.0.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.39.141.43.4
Update VisualEditor to version 1.39.14, 1.43.4, or 1.44.1 or later to patch the XSS vulnerability in the clipboard handler.
1.39.14, 1.43.4, or 1.44.1 depending on your current branch
- Identify the current VisualEditor version in your Wikimedia deployment
- For the 1.39.x branch: upgrade to version 1.39.14 or later
- For the 1.43.x branch: upgrade to version 1.43.4 or later
- For the 1.44.x branch: upgrade to version 1.44.1 or later
- After upgrading, verify the VisualEditor loads correctly and test clipboard functionality in the editor
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-61656 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-61656 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data