Improper Privilege ManagementWeakness · CWE-269

CVE-2025-6182

HIGH · 8.5 CVSS v4.0 Published 2025-08-20
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The StrongDM Windows service incorrectly handled communication related to system certificate management. Attackers could exploit this behavior to install untrusted root certificates or remove trusted ones.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The StrongDM Windows service has a vulnerability in how it handles communications related to system certificate management. An attacker could exploit this to install untrusted root certificates or remove trusted ones from the Windows certificate store, potentially enabling man-in-the-middle attacks or trust chain subversion.

MitigationApply available StrongDM patches immediately and conduct an audit of the Windows certificate store to identify and remove any unauthorized root certificates that may have been installed.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
Authentication
X
User interaction
None
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify StrongDM Windows service presence
    Open Windows Services (services.msc) and look for a service named 'StrongDM' or check Program Files for StrongDM installation directories
    Affected if The StrongDM Windows service is installed on the system
  2. Determine installed StrongDM version
    Open Programs and Features (appwiz.cpl), find StrongDM in the list, and note the version column; or run 'StrongDM --version' from command line if available
    Affected if The installed version is lower than the patched version (compare your installed version to the affected ranges)
  3. Inspect Windows certificate store for unauthorized root CAs
    Open Certificate Manager (certmgr.msc for user store or certlm.msc for machine store), expand 'Trusted Root Certification Authorities', and review all listed certificates for unknown or suspicious root CAs
    Affected if There are root certificates present that were not explicitly installed by your organization or are not from known trusted sources
  4. Check for recently added certificates
    In Certificate Manager, view certificate properties including 'Issued By' and 'Valid From' dates; look for certificates with recent issuance dates or suspicious issuer names
    Affected if Any certificates were added recently that do not correspond to known legitimate StrongDM or organizational certificates
  5. Review StrongDM configuration for certificate management
    Check StrongDM configuration files in its install directory for settings related to certificate management, root CA installation, or certificate store modification
    Affected if Certificate management features are enabled or configured in StrongDM settings

You are affected if the StrongDM Windows service is installed and the installed version is lower than the patched version, especially if unauthorized root certificates are found in the Windows certificate store.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply available StrongDM patches immediately and conduct an audit of the Windows certificate store to identify and remove any unauthorized root certificates that may have been installed.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
24.0 hours of engineering $4,260
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,816.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6182 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6182 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data