Monitouch V SftApplication · Fujielectric

CVE-2025-61858

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 6.2.7.0 or later.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in VS6ComFile!set_AnimationItem of V-SFT v6.2.7.0 and earlier. Opening specially crafted V-SFT files may lead to information disclosure, affected system's abnormal end (ABEND), and arbitrary code execution.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

An out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the set_AnimationItem function of VS6ComFile (V-SFT v6.2.7.0 and earlier) allows arbitrary code execution when processing specially crafted V-SFT files. The vulnerability stems from improper bounds validation during animation item parsing, leading to memory corruption.

MitigationAvoid opening untrusted V-SFT files until a vendor patch is available. Apply vendor updates immediately upon release.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Monitouch V SftApplication
Affected:<= 6.2.7.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Fujielectric Monitouch V Sft installation
    Look for V-SFT installation directory (commonly in Program Files or vendor-specified path) or check Windows registry for Monitouch V Sft entry
    Affected if The software is installed on the system
  2. Locate VS6ComFile component
    Find VS6ComFile.dll or the main V-SFT executable in the installation directory
    Affected if The vulnerable VS6ComFile component exists in the installation
  3. Determine installed V-SFT version
    Right-click the main V-SFT executable or VS6ComFile.dll, select Properties, and check the File Version field
    Affected if The reported version is 6.2.7.0 or earlier, or the version field is blank/unknown for an older release
  4. Verify animation processing capability
    Confirm the set_AnimationItem function is present by checking if the software can open or preview V-SFT animation files
    Affected if The software can process V-SFT files containing animation items, enabling the vulnerable code path

A user is affected if Fujielectric Monitouch V Sft with VS6ComFile version 6.2.7.0 or earlier is installed and can open V-SFT files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 6.2.7.0
Interim mitigation

Avoid opening untrusted V-SFT files until a vendor patch is available. Apply vendor updates immediately upon release.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

V-SFT version 6.2.8.0 or latest available release

  1. 1. Navigate to the official Monitouch V-SFT download page at monitouch.fujielectric.com
  2. 2. Locate the most recent V-SFT version available (version 6.2.8.0 or higher)
  3. 3. Download the installer for the latest V-SFT version
  4. 4. Uninstall the current V-SFT version (6.2.7.0 or earlier) from the affected system
  5. 5. Install the new V-SFT version downloaded in step 3
  6. 6. Verify the installation by checking the installed version matches the downloaded version
  7. 7. Re-test any V-SFT project files to ensure normal functionality
Caveat Review release notes for any changes in project file compatibility or deprecated features

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Monitouch V Sft Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
19.0 hours of engineering $3,280
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,248.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-61858 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-61858 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data