CVE-2025-61864
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA use after free vulnerability exists in VS6ComFile!load_link_inf of V-SFT v6.2.7.0 and earlier. Opening specially crafted V-SFT files may lead to information disclosure, affected system's abnormal end (ABEND), and arbitrary code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA use-after-free vulnerability exists in the load_link_inf function of the VS6ComFile component in V-SFT v6.2.7.0 and earlier. When the application opens a specially crafted V-SFT file, memory is freed but the program continues to use a dangling pointer to that freed memory region, leading to potential information disclosure, system crash (ABEND), or arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 6.2.7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if V-SFT software is installedLocate the Monitouch V-SFT installation directory or check installed programs list for Fujielectric Monitouch V SftAffected if V-SFT software is present on the system
-
Determine the installed V-SFT versionOpen V-SFT, navigate to Help > About, or check the executable file properties for the version numberAffected if The installed version is 6.2.7.0 or earlier
-
Identify VS6ComFile component usageCheck if the V-SFT application or any associated software uses the VS6ComFile component for file operationsAffected if VS6ComFile component is loaded or used by the application
-
Verify V-SFT file processing capabilityConfirm whether the application can open or parse V-SFT project files, as the vulnerability triggers when opening specially crafted filesAffected if The application has the capability to open V-SFT files
A system is affected if V-SFT version 6.2.7.0 or earlier is installed AND the application can open or process V-SFT files using the VS6ComFile component.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched version of V-SFT v6.2.7.0 when available. Until then, avoid opening untrusted V-SFT files and implement application-level input validation on V-SFT file parsing to detect malformed structures.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,632.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-61864 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-61864 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data