CVE-2025-61941
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA path traversal issue exists in WXR9300BE6P series firmware versions prior to Ver.1.10. Arbitrary file may be altered by an administrative user who logs in to the affected product. Moreover, arbitrary OS command may be executed via some file alteration.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencePath traversal vulnerability in WXR9300BE6P series firmware versions prior to Ver.1.10 allows an authenticated administrative user to alter arbitrary files on the filesystem. This file manipulation capability can be leveraged to achieve arbitrary OS command execution on the affected device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelLocate the device label, web interface, or system information page to confirm the model is WXR9300BE6P seriesAffected if Device is not a WXR9300BE6P series unit
-
Determine the installed firmware versionAccess the device administrative interface or check system information pages for the firmware version stringAffected if Firmware version cannot be determined or is earlier than Ver.1.10
-
Compare firmware version against the affected rangeCompare your installed version to Ver.1.10 - versions prior to Ver.1.10 are affectedAffected if Installed version is earlier than Ver.1.10 (e.g., Ver.1.09, Ver.1.08, etc.)
-
Verify administrative access statusCheck if the device administrative interface is accessible and whether user accounts with administrative privileges existAffected if Administrative access is available and the device is on vulnerable firmware
-
Audit for unauthorized file modificationsReview device logs, check for unexpected files in web-accessible directories, and monitor for suspicious file upload or modification activityAffected if Unexpected file changes or new suspicious files are found on the filesystem
The environment is affected if the device is a WXR9300BE6P series unit running firmware version prior to Ver.1.10 and administrative access is available.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade WXR9300BE6P firmware to Ver.1.10 or later to patch the path traversal vulnerability. Restrict administrative access and monitor for suspicious file modification activity until the update is applied.
Ver.1.10
- Obtain firmware Ver.1.10 or later for the WXR9300BE6P series from the official Buffalo vendor website
- Access the administrative web interface of the affected device
- Navigate to the firmware update or system settings section
- Upload the downloaded firmware file (Ver.1.10 or later)
- Apply the firmware update and wait for the device to reboot
- Verify the firmware version has been updated to Ver.1.10 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,552.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-61941 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-61941 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data