CVE-2025-61969
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect permission assignment in AMD µProf may allow a local user-privileged attacker to achieve privilege escalation, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAMD µProf contains an incorrect permission assignment vulnerability where the software sets improper file or system permissions, allowing a local unprivileged user to escalate privileges to a higher level, potentially achieving arbitrary code execution on the affected system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- P
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if AMD µProf is installedSearch for AMD µProf installation directories. On Windows, check 'C:\Program Files\AMD\µProf' or 'C:\Program Files\AMD\APU_PROF'. On Linux, check '/opt/amd/uprof' or '/usr/local/amd/uprof'. Use commands: 'dir "C:\Program Files\AMD" /ad' (Windows) or 'ls -la /opt/amd/ 2>/dev/null || ls -la /usr/local/amd/ 2>/dev/null' (Linux).Affected if AMD µProf directory exists on the system
-
Identify all executable files in the installationList all .exe, .dll, or binary files within the AMD µProf installation directory. On Windows: 'dir /s /b "C:\Program Files\AMD\*.*"'. On Linux: 'find /opt/amd/uprof -type f -executable 2>/dev/null'.Affected if Executable files are present in the µProf installation folder
-
Verify file permissions on executables and binariesCheck if files have overly permissive access. On Windows, use 'icacls "C:\Program Files\AMD\µProf\*"' to view permissions. On Linux, use 'ls -la /opt/amd/uprof/bin/' or 'namei -l /opt/amd/uprof/bin/*'. Look for 'Everyone', 'Users', or 'World' with Write or Modify permissions on executable files.Affected if Executable files grant write or modify access to unprivileged users (BUILTIN\Users or Everyone with Write/Modify permissions)
-
Check permissions on configuration filesLocate configuration or data files within the µProf directory. On Windows: 'dir /s /b "C:\Program Files\AMD\µProf\*.xml" "C:\Program Files\AMD\µProf\*.ini" "C:\Program Files\AMD\µProf\*.conf"'. On Linux: 'find /opt/amd/uprof -name "*.xml" -o -name "*.ini" -o -name "*.conf"'. Check permissions with 'icacls' (Windows) or 'ls -la' (Linux).Affected if Configuration files are world-writable or group-writable by non-admin users
-
Check service or driver file permissionsIf AMD µProf installs as a Windows service or kernel driver, check permissions on related files in system directories. Use 'sc qc uprof' (if service name known) or search for 'uprof' in C:\Windows\System32. Check if these files allow modification by standard users.Affected if Service executables or driver files can be modified by unprivileged users
The system is affected if AMD µProf is installed and any of its executable, configuration, or service files have permissions allowing unprivileged users to write or modify them, enabling privilege escalation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor patch from AMD when available, or contact AMD support for the corrected permission configuration; remove or restrict access to AMD µProf installations if a patch is not yet available.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-61969 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-61969 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data