Improper Signature VerificationWeakness · CWE-347

CVE-2025-6198

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-09-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
There is a vulnerability in the Supermicro BMC firmware validation logic at Supermicro MBD-X13SEM-F . An attacker can update the system firmware with a specially crafted image.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A vulnerability exists in the Supermicro BMC (Baseboard Management Controller) firmware validation logic on the X13SEM-F motherboard. The firmware validation mechanism can be bypassed, allowing an attacker to install a specially crafted malicious firmware image onto the system through the BMC update function.

MitigationApply the Supermicro BMC firmware patch when available. Until then, restrict access to the BMC management interface to authorized personnel only, use strong authentication, and implement network segmentation for out-of-band management ports.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the motherboard model
    Run command 'dmidecode -t baseboard' or check Supermicro system documentation to confirm the exact motherboard model is X13SEM-F
    Affected if The system is a Supermicro X13SEM-F motherboard - other Supermicro models are not affected by this specific vulnerability
  2. Check the BMC firmware version
    Access BMC web interface or run 'ipmitool -I lanplus -H <BMC_IP> -U admin -P <password> raw' command to retrieve firmware version, or check Supermicro's firmware release notes for the patched version number
    Affected if The installed BMC firmware version is older than Supermicro's patched version for this CVE - you must compare against Supermicro's official advisory
  3. Verify BMC management interface accessibility
    Check network configuration and firewall rules to determine if the BMC web interface (ports 80/443) or IPMI (port 623) is exposed to untrusted networks
    Affected if The BMC management interface is accessible from untrusted network segments - the vulnerability requires network access to the BMC update function
  4. Confirm BMC firmware update feature status
    Access BMC web interface under 'Maintenance' or 'Firmware Update' section, or use IPMI command 'ipmitool -I lanplus -H <BMC_IP> -U admin -P <password> raw 0x3c 0x12' to check if firmware upload is permitted
    Affected if The BMC firmware update/upload functionality is enabled and accessible - the attack vector requires this feature to be reachable
  5. Audit BMC user accounts and authentication
    Review BMC user list using 'ipmitool -I lanplus -H <BMC_IP> -U admin -P <password> user list' and check for weak or default credentials
    Affected if The BMC has weak, default, or compromised credentials - authentication is required to access the firmware update function

You are affected if you are running a Supermicro X13SEM-F motherboard with BMC firmware versions older than the patched release, and the BMC management interface with firmware update capability is accessible to an attacker.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Supermicro BMC firmware patch when available. Until then, restrict access to the BMC management interface to authorized personnel only, use strong authentication, and implement network segmentation for out-of-band management ports.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,330
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6198 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6198 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data