CVE-2025-62017
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in hogash KALLYAS kallyas.This issue affects KALLYAS: from n/a through <= 4.22.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a Missing Authorization vulnerability in the KALLYAS WordPress theme by Hogash. The vulnerability allows unauthorized users to access functionality that should be restricted to authenticated users with proper privileges. The specific endpoints or actions affected are not detailed in the available description.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm KALLYAS theme installationCheck wp-content/themes/ directory for kallyas folder, or inspect theme via WordPress admin (Appearance > Themes). Note the theme version displayed.Affected if KALLYAS theme is active and version cannot be determined or falls within an unpatched range
-
Identify theme version via filesOpen wp-content/themes/kallyas/style.css and read the 'Version:' header comment, or check version.php in the theme folder.Affected if Installed version is unknown or matches an affected version range (check Hogash changelogs for CVE-2025-62017)
-
Inspect AJAX action handlersSearch theme PHP files for add_action('wp_ajax_...) calls WITHOUT corresponding add_action('wp_ajax_nopriv_...) checks. Look in functions.php, includes folder, and any php files with 'ajax' in the name.Affected if AJAX endpoints exist that process requests without verifying user capabilities or authentication status
-
Review admin functionality access controlsGrep theme files for admin-only functions (add_menu_page, add_submenu_page) and check if they include current_user_can() checks before executing sensitive operations.Affected if Admin actions or pages lack current_user_can() capability verification before performing operations
-
Check for nonce verification in theme actionsSearch PHP files for form submissions and action handlers. Look for wp_verify_nonce() or check_admin_referer() calls adjacent to sensitive operations.Affected if Sensitive actions process requests without nonce verification, allowing potential CSRF or unauthorized execution
User is affected if KALLYAS theme is installed, unauthenticated or low-privilege users can access restricted functionality, and theme version lacks the CVE-2025-62017 security patch.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks (capability checks and nonce verification) on all sensitive WordPress actions and admin functionality within the theme. Restrict access to authenticated users with appropriate privileges.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-62017 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-62017 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data