CVE-2025-6203
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA malicious user may submit a specially-crafted complex payload that otherwise meets the default request size limit which results in excessive memory and CPU consumption of Vault. This may lead to a timeout in Vault’s auditing subroutine, potentially resulting in the Vault server to become unresponsive. This vulnerability, CVE-2025-6203, is fixed in Vault Community Edition 1.20.3 and Vault Enterprise 1.20.3, 1.19.9, 1.18.14, and 1.16.25.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a denial-of-service vulnerability in HashiCorp Vault where a specially-crafted complex payload that meets the default request size limit triggers excessive memory and CPU consumption in Vault's auditing subroutine, potentially causing timeouts and server unresponsiveness.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.15.0, < 1.16.27>= 1.15.0, < 1.21.0>= 1.18.0, < 1.18.15>= 1.19.0, < 1.19.11>= 1.20.0, < 1.20.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Vault versionRun `vault version` or examine the Vault binary metadataAffected if The version falls within 1.15.0 to 1.16.26, 1.18.0 to 1.18.14, 1.19.0 to 1.19.10, or 1.20.0 to 1.20.4
-
Verify audit devices are enabledRun `vault audit list -detailed` to list configured audit backendsAffected if Any audit device (syslog, file, socket, etc.) is enabled and active
-
Confirm default request size limit is in useCheck Vault configuration for `max_request_size` setting in the listener block; if not set, Vault uses the default 32MB limitAffected if The default 32MB request size limit is in place or the setting is not explicitly configured
-
Check for high memory or CPU usage patternsMonitor Vault process resource usage; review logs for auditing-related timeout or slowdown messagesAffected if Audit logging operations are causing noticeable latency, memory spikes, or CPU exhaustion
You are affected if Vault is running a vulnerable version (1.15.0-1.16.26, 1.18.0-1.18.14, 1.19.0-1.19.10, or 1.20.0-1.20.4) with auditing enabled and the default request size limit configured, leading to performance degradation during audit processing of large requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.16.271.18.151.19.11
Upgrade to Vault Community Edition 1.20.3 or Vault Enterprise 1.20.3/1.19.9/1.18.14/1.16.25. As a temporary measure, review and restrict audit logging configurations if available.
Vault Community/Enterprise 1.20.3 (or the latest 1.20.x stable release)
- 1. Identify the currently running Vault version using `vault version`
- 2. Based on your current version, plan the upgrade path to a fixed release
- 3. For Vault 1.15.x: Upgrade to 1.16.25 or later (ideally 1.20.3 for latest fixes)
- 4. For Vault 1.16.x: Upgrade to 1.16.25 or later
- 5. For Vault 1.17.x: Upgrade to 1.20.3 (1.17 is not listed with specific patch)
- 6. For Vault 1.18.x: Upgrade to 1.18.14 or later
- 7. For Vault 1.19.x: Upgrade to 1.19.9 or later
- 8. Before upgrading in production, test the upgrade in a non-production environment
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6203 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6203 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data