CVE-2025-62092
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in Wiremo Wiremo woo-reviews-by-wiremo allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Wiremo: from n/a through <= 1.4.99.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing authorization vulnerability in the Wiremo WooCommerce reviews plugin allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. The plugin fails to properly verify user permissions before allowing access to certain functionality, potentially enabling unauthorized users to access or manipulate review data and settings.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Wiremo plugin is installedIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Wiremo' or 'Wiremo WooCommerce Reviews' in the listAffected if The plugin is present and activated on the site
-
Determine installed plugin versionClick 'View details' on the Wiremo plugin in the WordPress plugins list, or check the plugin header in wp-content/plugins/wiremo-main/plugin.php for the 'Version' tagAffected if Version is within an affected range (if known) or cannot be determined for patching purposes
-
Verify WordPress user role permissionsInstall a user role editor plugin or check wp-users and wp-usermeta tables to list all user roles and their capabilities, specifically looking for roles with administrative or editor accessAffected if Unexpected users have administrative or editor-level capabilities that should not have review modification access
-
Test for unauthorized AJAX accessUse a tool like Burp Suite or curl to send unauthenticated or low-privilege requests to WordPress AJAX endpoints (wp-admin/admin-ajax.php) with wiremo-related actions, checking if sensitive review data is returnedAffected if AJAX endpoints return review data or allow modifications without requiring authentication or capability verification
-
Inspect plugin access control configurationCheck the plugin settings in WordPress admin under WooCommerce > Wiremo Reviews, or inspect the plugin PHP files for 'capability' or 'manage_options' checks around sensitive functionsAffected if Plugin lacks proper capability checks before executing review data operations
A site is affected if the Wiremo WooCommerce Reviews plugin is installed and allows unauthorized users to access or modify review data due to missing capability verification on sensitive functions
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper capability checks and authorization verification for all sensitive operations in the plugin, ensuring WordPress user permissions are validated before executing any administrative or data-modifying functions.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-62092 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-62092 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data