CVE-2025-62155
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNew API is a large language mode (LLM) gateway and artificial intelligence (AI) asset management system. Prior to version 0.9.6, a recently patched SSRF vulnerability contains a bypass method that can bypass the existing security fix and still allow SSRF to occur. Because the existing fix only applies security restrictions to the first URL request, a 302 redirect can bypass existing security measures and successfully access the intranet. This issue has been patched in version 0.9.6.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) bypass vulnerability in New API LLM gateway. The previously patched SSRF fix only applied security restrictions to the initial URL request, allowing attackers to use 302 HTTP redirects to bypass these restrictions and access internal/intranet resources.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm New API LLM gateway installationIdentify whether the New API LLM gateway product is deployed in your environment. Check for its service process, binary, or container image.Affected if The product is present in the environment.
-
Determine installed versionQuery the installed version of the New API LLM gateway using the product's CLI tool, API endpoint, or by inspecting the binary/package metadata.Affected if The installed version is earlier than 0.9.6.
-
Verify redirect handling is enabledInspect the gateway configuration files or runtime settings to confirm whether HTTP redirect handling (following 302/301 responses) is enabled for outbound URL requests.Affected if HTTP redirect following is enabled and the version is below 0.9.6.
-
Inspect URL security policiesReview the gateway's security configuration for SSRF protections. Check whether security rules are applied only to the initial URL or also to redirected URLs.Affected if Security restrictions apply only to the initial request URL and do not extend to redirected URLs.
You are affected if the New API LLM gateway version is below 0.9.6 and HTTP redirect handling is enabled, allowing an attacker to use 302 redirects to bypass SSRF protections and access internal resources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to version 0.9.6 or later which patches this bypass. If immediate upgrading is not feasible, temporarily disable or restrict URL redirection handling until the patch can be applied.
0.9.6
- Upgrade the New API (LLM gateway) installation to version 0.9.6 or later to remediate the SSRF bypass vulnerability
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,904.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-62155 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-62155 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data