CVE-2025-62258
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCSRF vulnerability in Headless API in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.107, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.4, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions allows remote attackers to execute any Headless API via the `endpoint` parameter.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Liferays Headless API allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary Headless API operations by tricking authenticated users into submitting requests through the vulnerable endpoint parameter, which lacks proper CSRF token validation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.3= 7.4= 2023.q3.1= 2023.q3.2= 2023.q3.3= 2023.q3.4>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.3.108CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Liferay versionCheck the Liferay version in the Control Panel under Configuration > Server Administration, or inspect the portal-version property in portal-ext.properties / portal-setup-wizard.properties, or look at the MANIFEST.MF file in the liferay-portal WARAffected if Version is 7.3.x, 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.107, or any 2023.q3.x release
-
Confirm Headless API is enabledAttempt to access the Headless API discovery endpoint at /o/api, or check the OSGi console for com.lifecycle.headsless.* bundles being active, or inspect the modules configuration for Headless API servicesAffected if Headless API endpoints are exposed and accessible (response 200 OK from /o/api)
-
Check CSRF token validation on Headless API endpointsReview the Headless API servlet configuration in the web.xml or OSGi config for CSRF token filter settings, or test by sending a POST request to a Headless API endpoint without an LFR-CSRF-Token header to see if it succeedsAffected if POST/PUT/DELETE requests to Headless API succeed without requiring a valid CSRF token (requests are processed without 403 error)
User is affected if running an affected Liferay version (7.3.x, 7.4.0-7.4.3.107, or 2023.q3.x) AND has Headless API enabled AND the endpoint accepts requests without CSRF token validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.4.3.108
Apply vendor patches (update 93+ for 7.4.x, update 36+ for 7.3.x, or upgrade to 2023.Q4+) and implement CSRF token validation on Headless API endpoints; disable Headless API if not required.
Limerick Portal 7.4.3.108+; Limerick DXP 2023.Q3.4+, 7.4 update 93+, 7.3 update 36+
- 1. Identify the current Limerick Portal or DXP version by checking the Limerick Control Panel or Gogo Shell
- 2. For Limerick Portal 7.4.x users: Plan upgrade to version 7.4.3.108 or later
- 3. For Limerick DXP 2023.Q3.x users: Plan upgrade to version 2023.Q3.4 or later
- 4. For Limerick DXP 7.4 GA users: Plan upgrade to update 93 or later
- 5. For Limerick DXP 7.3 GA users: Plan upgrade to update 36 or later
- 6. Perform a full backup of the current installation including database
- 7. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment before deploying to production
- 8. After upgrading, verify the Headless API CSRF protection is working by testing with the endpoint parameter
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-62258 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-62258 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data