CVE-2025-62263
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Liferay Portal 7.3.7 through 7.4.3.103, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.4, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 service pack 3 through update 36 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted payload injected into an Account Role’s “Title” text field to (1) view account role page, or (2) select account role page. Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Liferay Portal 7.3.7 through 7.4.3.103, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.4, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 service pack 3 through update 36 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted payload injected into an Organization’s “Name” text field to (1) view account page, (2) view account organization page, or (3) select account organization page.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored XSS vulnerabilities in Lifer DXP/Portal allow remote attackers to inject malicious scripts via Account Role's 'Title' field and Organization's 'Name' field. The payloads execute when users view or interact with the affected account role pages and organization pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.3= 7.4= 2023.q3.1= 2023.q3.2= 2023.q3.3= 2023.q3.4>= 7.3.7, < 7.4.3.104CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Lifer Portal/DXP versionLocate the Lifer version file or access the Control Panel > Configuration > Server Information to identify the installed version. Common paths: [Lifer-home]/portal-impl/build.number or via Gogo shell command 'sm --long'Affected if The installed version matches 7.3.x, 7.4.x, 2023.q3.1-4, or is >= 7.3.7 and < 7.4.3.104
-
Verify Account Roles feature is in useAccess Control Panel > Users > Roles, or query the database table User_ (or Role_ table depending on schema) to see if custom account roles with Title fields exist. Check if Account Roles functionality is enabled in portal.properties: 'account.role.enbled=true'Affected if Account Roles are created or the feature is active in the environment
-
Verify Organizations feature is in useAccess Control Panel > Users > Organizations, or query the database table Organization_ to see if any organizations are definedAffected if Organizations exist in the system with custom names
-
Inspect Account Role Title values for XSS payloadsQuery the database: SELECT * FROM AccountRole WHERE title LIKE '%<script%' OR title LIKE '%onerror%' OR title LIKE '%onload%' (or inspect via Control Panel > Users > Roles > Account Roles > [select role] > Details tab)Affected if The Account Role Title field contains unsanitized HTML/JavaScript such as <script>, event handlers like onerror/onload, or encoded variants
-
Inspect Organization Name values for XSS payloadsQuery the database: SELECT * FROM Organization_ WHERE name LIKE '%<script%' OR name LIKE '%onerror%' OR name LIKE '%onload%' (or inspect via Control Panel > Users > Organizations > [select org] > Details tab)Affected if The Organization Name field contains unsanitized HTML/JavaScript such as <script>, event handlers like onerror/onload, or encoded variants
A user is affected if their Lifer version falls within the affected range AND they have Account Roles or Organizations configured, with malicious scripts present in the Title or Name fields respectively.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.4.3.104
Upgrade to Lifer 7.4.3.104 or later, or apply the appropriate patches for DXP versions. Implement server-side input validation and output encoding for the Account Role Title and Organization Name fields as a compensating control.
Liferan Portal 7.4.3.104+ / Liferan Portal 7.3 SP36+ / Liferan DXP 2023.Q3.4+
- 1. Identify the exact Liferan product and version currently running (Portal or DXP, and specific version number)
- 2. For Liferan Portal 7.4.x: Upgrade to version 7.4.3.104 or later
- 3. For Liferan Portal 7.3.x: Upgrade to service pack 36 or later
- 4. For Liferan DXP 2023.Q3.x: Upgrade to version 2023.Q3.4 or later
- 5. For Liferan DXP 7.4 GA: Upgrade to update 93 or later
- 6. For Liferan DXP 7.3: Upgrade to service pack 36 or later
- 7. After upgrade, verify that the Account Role 'Title' and Organization 'Name' fields properly encode user input to prevent XSS
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-62263 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-62263 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data