CVE-2025-62276
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Document Library and the Adaptive Media modules in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.10, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions uses an incorrect cache-control header, which allows local users to obtain access to downloaded files via the browser's cache.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Document Library and Adaptive Media modules in Liferium Portal and DXP set incorrect cache-control headers on downloaded files, causing browsers to cache sensitive documents locally. This allows local users on shared computers to access previously downloaded files through the browser cache.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.4= 2023.q3.1= 2023.q3.2= 2023.q3.3= 2023.q3.4= 2023.q3.5= 2023.q3.6= 2023.q3.7= 2023.q3.8= 2023.q3.9= 2023.q3.10= 2023.q4.0>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.3.112CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Lifteral DXP/Portal versionAccess the Liferay Control Panel (Control Panel > Configuration > System Information) or check the portal-ext.properties file for the version property, or query the OSGi console with 'lb | grep liferay-portal'Affected if The version matches 7.4, any 2023.q3.x (q3.1 through q3.10), 2023.q4.0, or is >= 7.4.0 but < 7.4.3.112
-
Verify Document Library module is activeIn the OSGi Felix console (http://server:port/o/felix-console), search for 'com-liferay-document-library' or check the Document Library portlet is deployed in the Control Panel under Content > Document LibraryAffected if Document Library is present and functional on the portal
-
Verify Adaptive Media module is activeIn the OSGi Felix console, search for 'com-ladaptive-media' or check if Adaptive Media is enabled under Control Panel > Configuration > Adaptive MediaAffected if Adaptive Media is enabled and processing images or documents
-
Inspect cache-control headers for Document Library downloadsDownload a test file from the Document Library (navigate to a document, use browser DevTools Network tab or run curl -I on the download URL), then examine the HTTP response headers for the 'Cache-Control' headerAffected if Cache-Control header is missing, or set to 'public', 'max-age', or any value other than 'no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, private' (or similar restrictive directive)
-
Inspect cache-control headers for Adaptive Media downloadsRequest a media file processed by Adaptive Media (image or document thumbnail), examine the HTTP response headers for the 'Cache-Control' header using curl -I or browser DevToolsAffected if Cache-Control header is missing, or set to 'public', 'max-age', or any value that permits browser caching
A user is affected if running a Liferay DXP or Portal version listed in the affected range AND uses Document Library or Adaptive Media modules AND the Cache-Control headers on downloaded files do not contain restrictive directives (no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, or private).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.4.3.112
Configure proper cache-control headers (no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, private) for file downloads in the Document Library and Adaptive Media modules to prevent browser caching of sensitive documents.
Liferay Portal 7.4.3.112+ or Lifera DXP 2023.Q4.11+/2023.Q3.11+/7.4 GA update 93+
- 1. Backup your current Liferay instance and database before proceeding with any upgrade.
- 2. For Liferay Portal 7.4.x users: Upgrade to version 7.4.3.112 or later.
- 3. For Liferay DXP users: Upgrade to one of the following fixed releases: 2023.Q4.11, 2023.Q3.11, or 7.4 GA update 93 or later.
- 4. After upgrading, verify that the Document Library and Adaptive Media modules are functioning correctly.
- 5. Clear browser caches and test that proper cache-control headers are being sent for downloaded files.
- 6. If running in a clustered environment, ensure all nodes are upgraded to the same fixed version.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-62276 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-62276 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data