SoplanningApplication

CVE-2025-62294

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-11-20
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.55.00 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SOPlanning is vulnerable to Predictable Generation of Password Recovery Token. Due to weak mechanism of generating recovery tokens, a malicious attacker is able to brute-force all possible values and takeover any account in reasonable amount of time. This issue was fixed in version 1.55.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

SOPlanning uses a weak, predictable algorithm to generate password recovery tokens. An attacker can enumerate valid tokens through brute-force due to insufficient entropy in the token generation mechanism, enabling complete account takeover of any user account.

MitigationUpgrade to SOPlanning version 1.55 or later which implements cryptographically secure token generation. Additionally, implement rate limiting on password reset endpoints to further mitigate brute-force attempts.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SoplanningApplication
Affected:< 1.55.00

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify SOPlanning installation
    Locate the SOPlanning application in your environment. This is typically deployed as a web application. Check your web server document roots, application directories, or container images for the SOPlanning codebase.
    Affected if SOPlanning is not installed in the environment - you are not affected.
  2. Determine installed version
    Locate the version file or version indicator within the SOPlanning installation. Check for a version.php file, a config file with version information, or the main index file that may display version details. Compare your found version against the vulnerable range.
    Affected if The installed version is 1.55.00 or later - you are NOT affected. The installed version is earlier than 1.55.00 - you ARE affected.
  3. Verify password recovery is accessible
    Check if the password recovery or 'forgot password' functionality is enabled and accessible on your SOPlanning instance. This is typically found at a URL path like /password_forgot.php or similar. Confirm the endpoint responds and accepts user input.
    Affected if Password recovery functionality is disabled or not accessible - the attack surface may be reduced but the weak algorithm still exists in the codebase.

You are affected if SOPlanning is installed with a version earlier than 1.55.00 and the password recovery feature is accessible, as the weak token generation algorithm allows brute-force enumeration leading to account takeover.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.55.00 or later
Fixed in 1.55.00
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to SOPlanning version 1.55 or later which implements cryptographically secure token generation. Additionally, implement rate limiting on password reset endpoints to further mitigate brute-force attempts.

Recommended fix High confidence

Soplanning 1.55 (or 1.55.00)

  1. 1. Verify current Soplanning version is below 1.55.00
  2. 2. Obtain Soplanning version 1.55 from the official vendor (www.soplanning.org)
  3. 3. Back up the existing database and configuration files before upgrading
  4. 4. Apply the version 1.55 upgrade following standard upgrade procedures
Caveat Review release notes for version 1.55 to check for any breaking changes or required migration steps

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Soplanning Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-62294 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-62294 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data