CVE-2025-62329
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHCL DevOps Deploy / HCL Launch is susceptible to a race condition in http-session client-IP binding enforcement which may allow a session to be briefly reused from a new IP address before it is invalidated. This could lead to unauthorized access under certain network conditions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHCL DevOps Deploy and HCL Launch contain a race condition in HTTP session management where client-IP binding enforcement fails to properly invalidate sessions when accessed from a new IP address. An attacker on a different IP could briefly reuse an existing session before it gets invalidated, potentially allowing unauthorized access during that narrow time window.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.0.0.0, < 8.0.1.11>= 8.1.0, < 8.1.2.4>= 7.3.0.0, < 7.3.2.16CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed HCL productDetermine if HCL DevOps Deploy or HCL Launch is installed. Check for installation directories, services, or process names. DevOps Deploy typically runs on port 8080, Launch on port 8443 or 443.Affected if Either HCL DevOps Deploy or HCL Launch is installed
-
Determine the installed versionCheck the product version through the admin console, installation directory files, or version lookup command. For DevOps Deploy, check the manifest or version file in the installation directory. For Launch, check the version info in the web UI or installation files.Affected if The installed version falls within: DevOps Deploy 8.0.0.0 through 8.0.1.10, or 8.1.0 through 8.1.2.3, or Launch 7.3.0.0 through 7.3.2.15
-
Check if session IP binding is enabledReview the session management configuration files (typically web.xml or session-config in the application's configuration). Look for IP binding settings or custom session validators that bind sessions to client IP addresses.Affected if IP binding for sessions is not configured or is misconfigured, allowing sessions to remain valid across different IP addresses
-
Verify network exposureAssess whether the HCL application is accessible from untrusted networks or the internet. Check firewall rules, reverse proxy configurations, and access control lists that permit external access to the application ports.Affected if The application is accessible from networks other than trusted internal networks
-
Review session timeout configurationExamine the session-timeout setting in the application's web.xml or equivalent configuration file. Check both the global container settings and any application-specific session configurations.Affected if Session timeouts are set to unusually long durations, increasing the window of opportunity for session hijacking
You are affected if you run DevOps Deploy versions 8.0.0.0-8.0.1.10 or 8.1.0-8.1.2.3, or Launch versions 7.3.0.0-7.3.2.15, and the application is accessible from networks where an attacker could attempt to use a session from a different IP address.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.3.2.168.0.1.118.1.2.4
Apply vendor patches when available. Consider implementing additional session security controls such as stricter IP binding, shorter session timeouts, or supplementary authentication factors for sensitive operations.
HCL DevOps Deploy 8.0.1.11 or 8.1.2.4; HCL Launch 7.3.2.16 (depending on your current major.minor version)
- For HCL DevOps Deploy 8.0.0.x through 8.0.1.x: Upgrade to version 8.0.1.11
- For HCL DevOps Deploy 8.1.0.x through 8.1.2.x: Upgrade to version 8.1.2.4
- For HCL Launch 7.3.0.0 through 7.3.2.x: Upgrade to version 7.3.2.16
- After upgrading, verify the session IP binding behavior works correctly in your environment
- Consult HCL documentation for any specific post-upgrade configuration requirements
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-62329 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-62329 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data