CVE-2025-62497
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in SNC-CX600W versions prior to Ver.2.8.0. If a user accesses a specially crafted webpage while logged in, unintended operations may be performed.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery) vulnerability in the web interface of the SNC-CX600W network camera. An attacker can craft a malicious webpage that, when visited by an authenticated user, will cause the user's browser to send unintended requests to the camera's web interface, potentially performing administrative operations without the user's consent.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.8.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelAccess the camera's web interface or check the device label/metadata to confirm the model is SNC-CX600WAffected if Device is not an SNC-CX600W model
-
Check firmware versionLog into the camera web interface and navigate to System > Product Information, or use the ONVIF or SNMP interface to query the firmware versionAffected if Firmware version is less than 2.8.0 (e.g., 2.7.x, 2.6.x, etc.)
-
Verify web interface is accessibleAttempt to access the camera's HTTP/HTTPS web interface on the expected IP address or hostnameAffected if Web interface is accessible from a network where untrusted websites could be visited
-
Confirm authentication session is activeCheck if there are active authenticated sessions to the camera's admin interface, or if the camera allows persistent loginAffected if Users are logged into the camera web interface while browsing other websites
The environment is affected if the device is an SNC-CX600W running firmware below version 2.8.0 and its web interface is accessible to users who also browse untrusted websites.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.8.0
Upgrade the SNC-CX600W firmware to version 2.8.0 or later, which includes anti-CSRF protections. As a temporary mitigation, avoid browsing untrusted websites while logged into the camera admin interface.
Ver.2.8.0
- Check the current firmware version of the SNC-CX600W by accessing the camera's web interface and navigating to the system information or maintenance section
- Download the firmware version 2.8.0 or later from the official Sony support website (support.sony.com)
- Access the camera's web interface as an administrator
- Navigate to the firmware update or maintenance section of the web interface
- Upload the downloaded firmware file and follow the on-screen instructions to complete the update
- After the update completes, verify the firmware version has been updated to 2.8.0 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-62497 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-62497 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data