CVE-2025-62527
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedTaguette is an open source qualitative research tool. An issue has been discovered in Taguette versions prior to 1.5.0. It was possible for an attacker to request password reset email containing a malicious link, allowing the attacker to set the email if clicked by the victim. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIn Taguette versions prior to 1.5.0, the password reset functionality contains a vulnerability where an attacker can request a password reset for a victim and the resulting reset email contains a manipulatable link. When the victim clicks this link, it allows the attacker to modify the account's email address. This appears to be a flaw in the password reset token validation and email change authorization logic.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Taguette versionLocate the installed Taguette version (typically via package manager, docker image tag, or application interface) and compare it to the affected range: any version prior to 1.5.0Affected if Installed version is 1.5.0 or lower
-
Confirm password reset functionality is accessibleVerify that the password reset endpoint is enabled and accessible in the deployment (commonly at /password/reset or similar path in the web interface)Affected if Password reset feature is enabled and the version is vulnerable
-
Identify deployment methodDetermine how Taguette is deployed (pip, docker, system package) to understand where version information is stored and how to verify itAffected if Version cannot be confirmed due to unclear deployment
The environment is affected if Taguette version 1.5.0 or lower is installed and the password reset functionality is enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Taguette version 1.5.0 or later. Additionally, implement rate limiting on password reset endpoints to prevent abuse and monitor for unusual password reset request patterns.
1.5.0
- Stop the Taguette service
- Backup the existing Taguette installation and database
- Upgrade Taguette to version 1.5.0
- Verify the upgrade was successful
- Restart the Taguette service
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-62527 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-62527 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data