CVE-2025-62623
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA heap-based buffer overflow in the ionic cloud driver for VMware ESXi could allow an attacker to achieve privilege escalation, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the ionic cloud driver for VMware ESXi allows an attacker with local access to achieve privilege escalation, potentially executing arbitrary code with elevated privileges on the hypervisor.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm VMware ESXi is installedRun 'vmware -v' or check /etc/vmware/version to identify the hypervisorAffected if System is not VMware ESXi (this CVE only affects ESXi)
-
Locate the ionic cloud driverSearch for the ionic cloud driver module file: 'find / -name "*ionic*" 2>/dev/null' or check /usr/lib/vmware/ionic for driver componentsAffected if The ionic cloud driver component is not present on the system
-
Verify ionic cloud driver is loadedRun 'esxcli system module list' to list loaded modules and look for ionic-related modules, or check 'vmware -l' for loaded driversAffected if The ionic cloud driver is not loaded or active (exploit requires the driver to be running)
-
Check ESXi version against vendor patch statusRun 'vmware -v' to get the build number and version, then compare against VMware security advisories for CVE-2025-62623 patched versionsAffected if The ESXi version/build predates the vendor patch for this CVE (version is vulnerable)
-
Inspect driver configuration and access controlsReview driver configuration files in /etc/vmware/ionic/ or check 'esxcli system module parameter list' for ionic driver parametersAffected if Driver is accessible without proper administrative access controls or has insecure configuration parameters
User is affected if running VMware ESXi with the ionic cloud driver loaded, where the ESXi version predates the vendor patch for CVE-2025-62623
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-supplied VMware ESXi patch for CVE-2025-62623 and restart affected hosts as required. Restrict access to the ionic cloud driver interfaces to trusted administrative personnel only.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-62623 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-62623 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data