CVE-2025-62641
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.12 and 7.2.2. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceVulnerability in Oracle VM VirtualBox Core component affecting versions 7.1.12 and 7.2.2. This is a local privilege escalation vulnerability requiring high-privileged attacker with logon access to the VirtualBox host infrastructure to compromise VirtualBox and potentially impact additional products (scope change). Successful exploitation yields complete takeover with confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.1.12= 7.2.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if VirtualBox is installedOn Windows, look in C:\Program Files\Oracle\VirtualBox or check registry key HKLM\SOFTWARE\Oracle\VirtualBox. On Linux, run 'dpkg -l | grep virtualbox' or 'rpm -qa | grep virtualbox'. On macOS, check /Applications for VirtualBox.app.Affected if VirtualBox is present on the system
-
Retrieve the installed VirtualBox versionRun 'VBoxManage --version' from command line. On Windows, you can also read the version from the About dialog in VirtualBox GUI or check the version.dll in the VirtualBox installation directory.Affected if Command fails or returns no version (VirtualBox not fully installed)
-
Compare your version to affected releasesMatch the retrieved version string against exactly 7.1.12 or 7.2.2. Note that only these two specific versions are affected, not earlier or later minor releases.Affected if Installed version equals 7.1.12 or 7.2.2 exactly
-
Verify VirtualBox services are runningOn Windows, check if VirtualBox system service (VBoxSVC) or related processes are active via Task Manager or 'sc query vboxsvc'. On Linux, check for vboxdrv kernel module loaded via 'lsmod | grep vbox'.Affected if VirtualBox is installed and services are active - this confirms the attack surface exists
A system is affected only if VirtualBox is installed AND the exact installed version matches either 7.1.12 or 7.2.2 with VirtualBox services actively running.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-supplied patch when available; until then, restrict access to VirtualBox host systems to high-trust administrators only and follow least-privilege principles.
Latest VirtualBox 7.2.x or 8.x stable release (Oracle has patched this vulnerability in subsequent releases)
- 1. Back up any critical virtual machines and configurations
- 2. Download the latest VirtualBox version from the official Oracle website (https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads)
- 3. Uninstall the current VirtualBox version (7.1.12 or 7.2.2)
- 4. Install the latest VirtualBox release
- 5. Re-register any existing virtual machines and verify they function correctly
- 6. Test that the vulnerability is no longer present by verifying high-privileged operations work as expected
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-62641 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-62641 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data