CVE-2025-62650
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Restaurant Brands International (RBI) assistant platform through 2025-09-06 relies on client-side authentication for use of the diagnostic screen.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe RBI assistant platform's diagnostic screen relies on client-side authentication (likely JavaScript or UI-based checks) rather than proper server-side validation, allowing unauthenticated attackers to access sensitive diagnostic functionality by bypassing client-side controls.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2025-09-06CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify RBI Assistant installationLocate the RBI Restaurant Brands International Assistant platform in your environment - this may be a web application, desktop client, or integrated system. Check installed programs, running services, or hosted web applications.Affected if The platform is present in the environment
-
Determine installed versionFind the installed version of RBI Restaurant Brands International Assistant through the application's about screen, installed software inventory, or system configuration. Compare against the affected range of <= 2025-09-06.Affected if The version is 2025-09-06 or earlier
-
Locate diagnostic functionalityIdentify the diagnostic screen or diagnostic features within the RBI Assistant platform. This is typically accessed through a specific menu option, URL path, or feature toggle related to system diagnostics or troubleshooting.Affected if Diagnostic screen or diagnostic features exist in the installation
-
Test client-side authentication bypassAttempt to access the diagnostic functionality directly without authenticating or logging in. Observe if client-side controls (JavaScript validation, UI element hiding, URL parameter manipulation) can be bypassed to reach diagnostic features.Affected if Diagnostic functionality is accessible without valid server-side authentication credentials
-
Verify server-side validation presenceInspect network requests and server responses when attempting to access diagnostic features. Check if the server properly validates authentication tokens, session cookies, or authorization headers before returning diagnostic data.Affected if Server does not require valid authentication or returns diagnostic data to unauthenticated requests
If the diagnostic screen is accessible without proper server-side authentication validation, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper server-side authentication and authorization for the diagnostic screen, moving all access control logic from the client to the server and validating user sessions before granting access to diagnostic features.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-62650 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-62650 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data