CVE-2025-62741
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SmartDataSoft Pool Services pool-services allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Pool Services: from n/a through <= 3.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · low confidenceServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SmartDataSoft Pool Services pool-services allows attackers to induce the server to make arbitrary requests to internal or external resources, potentially accessing sensitive internal services or bypassing network segmentation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SmartDataSoft Pool Services installationLocate the pool-services application on your system by checking running processes, installed packages, or service listings (e.g., systemctl list-units, docker ps, or directory listings in common application paths)Affected if pool-services is running as a service or installed application on the system
-
Determine the installed versionQuery the application for its version information using command-line flags (e.g., --version, -v), check configuration files, or consult the application's built-in about/info endpoint if availableAffected if the version cannot be determined or is older than any patched release that addresses this vulnerability
-
Identify URL input functionalityReview application configuration files, API endpoints, or web interfaces for features that accept URL inputs, such as external resource fetching, webhook configurations, or URL preview featuresAffected if URL input functionality is present and accessible (even if not actively used, the vulnerable code path exists)
-
Assess network exposureExamine network binding configuration and firewall rules to determine if the pool-services interface is exposed to untrusted networks or the internetAffected if the service is accessible from outside the trusted network boundary
-
Check for indicators of exploitationReview application logs, access logs, and network connection logs for suspicious outbound requests originating from the pool-services process, especially to internal IP ranges or unusual external destinationsAffected if unusual outbound connections are observed from the pool-services process
You are affected if SmartDataSoft Pool Services is running and the version is vulnerable to CVE-2025-62741, especially if URL input features are exposed to network attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict allowlist validation for URL inputs, disable unnecessary URL schemas, apply network segmentation, and upgrade to a patched version once available.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-62741 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-62741 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data