CVE-2025-6278
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability classified as critical was found in Upsonic up to 0.55.6. This vulnerability affects the function os.path.join of the file markdown/server.py. The manipulation of the argument file.filename leads to path traversal. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA path traversal vulnerability in Upsonic up to version 0.55.6 allows attackers to manipulate the file.filename argument passed to os.path.join in markdown/server.py, potentially enabling unauthorized file system access outside the intended directory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 0.55.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Upsonic installation and versionRun 'pip show upsonic' or check your package manager to determine the installed version of Upsonic. Compare this version to the affected range: <= 0.55.6Affected if The installed version of Upsonic is 0.55.6 or lower
-
Locate the vulnerable fileSearch for the file markdown/server.py within the Upsonic installation directory. Common paths include site-packages/upsonic/ or the project vendor directory.Affected if The file markdown/server.py exists in the Upsonic package
-
Identify the vulnerable code patternOpen markdown/server.py and search for 'os.path.join' calls that incorporate 'file.filename' or similar user-controlled input without os.path.basename() sanitizationAffected if The code uses os.path.join with file.filename without sanitizing directory traversal sequences
-
Determine if file upload/download functionality is exposedReview the application's routing or API endpoints in markdown/server.py to confirm if file operations are accessible to users (check for Flask routes, FastAPI endpoints, or similar that handle file.filename)Affected if File operations using the vulnerable code path are exposed to untrusted input
A user is affected if they are running Upsonic version 0.55.6 or lower and the application exposes file operations that use os.path.join with unsanitized file.filename input from markdown/server.py.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict input validation and path sanitization on the file.filename parameter before using it with os.path.join, ensuring the resolved path remains within the intended directory boundaries.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6278 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6278 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data