CVE-2025-62850
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA NULL pointer dereference vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to launch a denial-of-service (DoS) attack. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QuTS hero h5.2.9.3410 build 20260214 and later QuTS hero h5.3.4.3500 build 20260520 and later QuTS hero h6.0.0.3459 build 20260409 and later
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA NULL pointer dereference vulnerability in QNAP QuTS hero OS that can be exploited by an attacker who already possesses administrator credentials to cause a denial-of-service condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= h5.2.0.2737, < h5.2.9.3410>= h5.3.0.3115, < h5.3.4.3500>= h6.0.0.3324, < h6.0.0.3459CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate QuTS hero version in admin consoleLog into the QNAP admin web interface, go to Control Panel > System > Firmware/Environment, and record the Build Number and Firmware Version displayed.Affected if The displayed version falls within h5.2.0.2737 to h5.2.9.3409, h5.3.0.3115 to h5.3.4.3499, or h6.0.0.3324 to h6.0.0.3458.
-
Verify QuTS hero version via CLIAccess the NAS via SSH using an administrator account, then run the command 'getsysinfo system' or 'cat /proc/board_version' to retrieve the firmware build number.Affected if The reported build number matches any of the affected version ranges listed above.
-
Confirm remote admin access is enabledIn the admin web interface, go to Control Panel > System > General Settings, and check whether 'Allow SSH connection' or the QNAP cloud management access is enabled.Affected if Remote SSH or cloud management access is enabled, making the system reachable for an authenticated remote attacker.
-
Check for administrator account exposureReview the list of administrator accounts in Control Panel > Privilege > Administrators and verify that credentials are not shared, default, or compromised.Affected if Administrator credentials are weak, shared, or may have been compromised, enabling the attacker to exploit the vulnerability.
You are affected if your QuTS hero version is within any of the three vulnerable ranges AND remote administrator access is enabled or an attacker could obtain administrator credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the available firmware updates (QuTS hero h5.2.9.3410 build 20260214, h5.3.4.3500 build 20260520, or h6.0.0.3459 build 20260409 and later). Prior to patching, verify administrator account integrity and review access logs for potential compromise.
QuTS hero h5.2.9.3410 (build 20260214) or later / h5.3.4.3500 (build 20260520) or later / h6.0.0.3459 (build 20260409) or later depending on current branch
- Identify the current QuTS hero version running on the QNAP device via the admin console or command line
- Determine which version branch the current installation falls into (h5.2.x, h5.3.x, or h6.0.x)
- For systems on h5.2.x branch: upgrade to QuTS hero h5.2.9.3410 (build 20260214) or later
- For systems on h5.3.x branch: upgrade to QuTS hero h5.3.4.3500 (build 20260520) or later
- For systems on h6.0.x branch: upgrade to QuTS hero h6.0.0.3459 (build 20260409) or later
- Perform the upgrade via QNAP App Center or firmware update mechanism
- After upgrade, verify the new version is running and the vulnerability is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-62850 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-62850 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data