CVE-2025-62962
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Andrea Landonio CloudSearch cloud-search allows Stored XSS.This issue affects CloudSearch: from n/a through <= 3.0.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the CloudSearch plugin enables attackers to trick authenticated users into performing unintended actions that inject malicious scripts (Stored XSS). The lack of anti-CSRF tokens allows attackers to craft malicious requests that store persistent JavaScript payloads.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify CloudSearch plugin installationLocate the CloudSearch plugin files in your CMS/plugin directory and note the installed version from the plugin metadata or version file.Affected if The CloudSearch plugin is present and running in the environment.
-
Identify state-changing plugin endpointsReview the CloudSearch plugin's source code or network traffic to identify POST/PUT endpoints that modify data (e.g., saving search configurations, updating settings, adding content).Affected if State-changing operations exist in the plugin without additional context.
-
Inspect for anti-CSRF token implementationExamine the plugin's code for CSRF protection mechanisms - look for token generation, validation functions, or use of security libraries that verify request authenticity on identified endpoints.Affected if Anti-CSRF tokens are missing or not validated on state-changing operations.
-
Check input validation and output encodingSearch the plugin source code for input sanitization functions (e.g., htmlspecialchars, strip_tags, validation libraries) applied to user-supplied data before storage and before output rendering.Affected if User-controllable inputs are stored without validation and rendered without encoding, allowing stored XSS.
The environment is affected if the CloudSearch plugin is installed and its state-changing operations lack anti-CSRF token validation, enabling Stored XSS via CSRF attacks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens on state-changing operations and apply proper input validation and output encoding to prevent XSS injection and execution.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-62962 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-62962 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data