Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2025-62999

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-12-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
60/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in themezaa Litho Addons litho-addons allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Litho Addons: from n/a through <= 3.5.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a Missing Authorization (Broken Access Control) vulnerability in the Litho Addons WordPress theme plugin. The vulnerability allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels, potentially enabling unauthorized access to privileged functionality or sensitive data due to missing or improper authorization checks on certain endpoints or operations.

MitigationImplement proper authorization validation on all sensitive operations and update to a patched version of Litho Addons once released. Review and enforce role-based access control (RBAC) for all user-facing functionality.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Litho Addons plugin is installed
    Navigate to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins > Installed Plugins, or inspect the /wp-content/plugins/ directory for a folder named 'litho-addons' or similar.
    Affected if The Litho Addons plugin is found in the WordPress installation.
  2. Determine the installed version of Litho Addons
    In the WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed Plugins, locate Litho Addons and read the version number displayed. Alternatively, check the main plugin PHP file for a 'Version' header comment.
    Affected if A version of Litho Addons is installed and no patched version is available from the vendor.
  3. Check for exposed AJAX endpoints
    Inspect the plugin's main PHP files for wp_ajax_ and wp_ajax_nopriv_ hooks. These are typically found using grep or by examining files in the /includes/ or /classes/ folders of the plugin.
    Affected if AJAX endpoints are registered without capability checks or nonce verification.
  4. Review WordPress user role permissions
    Go to WordPress admin > Users > Roles and Permissions, or use a role editor plugin to review what capabilities are assigned to each user role.
    Affected if Lower-privileged users (subscribers, contributors) have elevated capabilities that should be restricted.
  5. Audit access control on plugin functionality
    Examine plugin PHP files for functions that handle sensitive operations (database modifications, content creation, settings changes) and verify if current_user_can() checks are present before execution.
    Affected if Sensitive operations lack proper authorization checks using current_user_can() or role verification.

A user is affected if Litho Addons is installed and contains AJAX endpoints or sensitive operations that do not enforce proper authorization validation before executing.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authorization validation on all sensitive operations and update to a patched version of Litho Addons once released. Review and enforce role-based access control (RBAC) for all user-facing functionality.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-62999 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-62999 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data