CVE-2025-63531
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA SQL injection vulnerability exists in the Blood Bank Management System 1.0 within the receiverLogin.php component. The application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input in SQL queries, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary SQL code. By manipulating the remail and rpassword fields, an attacker can bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access to the system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Blood Bank Management System 1.0's receiverLogin.php component allows attackers to inject arbitrary SQL code through the remail and rpassword fields, enabling authentication bypass and unauthorized system access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Blood Bank Management System installationSearch for files or directories containing 'blood bank' or 'bloodbank' in the web server's document root, and check for receiverLogin.php in accessible web pathsAffected if The application is installed and receiverLogin.php exists in a web-accessible directory
-
Verify the installed versionCheck application version information - typically found in README files, version constants in PHP files, or admin dashboard about pagesAffected if Version is 1.0 (exact match to the affected version)
-
Locate receiverLogin.phpFind receiverLogin.php in the web application directory structureAffected if The file exists and is accessible via HTTP/HTTPS
-
Examine SQL query implementation in receiverLogin.phpOpen receiverLogin.php and inspect the SQL query handling for remail and rpassword parameters - look for direct concatenation of user input into SQL strings without prepared statements or parameter bindingAffected if The code shows unsanitized $_POST or $_REQUEST variables used directly in SQL queries for remail and rpassword parameters
-
Check application accessibilityDetermine if the login page at receiverLogin.php is reachable over the network (internal or external)Affected if The vulnerable endpoint is accessible to users who could inject SQL payloads
You are affected if Blood Bank Management System version 1.0 is installed, receiverLogin.php exists, and the remail/rpassword parameters are used directly in SQL queries without prepared statements or input sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace vulnerable SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements and implement proper input validation and sanitization on the remail and rpassword parameters.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-63531 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-63531 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data