CVE-2025-6359
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in code-projects Simple Pizza Ordering System 1.0. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /cashconfirm.php. The manipulation of the argument transactioncode leads to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in the transactioncode parameter of /cashconfirm.php in Simple Pizza Ordering System 1.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unsanitized user input.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the vulnerable PHP fileSearch the web server's document root for the file cashconfirm.php. Common paths may include /var/www/html/ or C:\xampp\htdocs\ on Windows. Use: find /var/www -name 'cashconfirm.php' 2>/dev/nullAffected if The file cashconfirm.php exists in the web application directory
-
Verify the application versionCheck for a version file, readme, or header comments in the application source code. Look for version indicators such as 'version 1.0' or check the application's main entry point or about pageAffected if The installed version is Carmelo Simple Pizza Ordering System 1.0
-
Examine the SQL query in cashconfirm.phpOpen cashconfirm.php and locate the code handling the transactioncode parameter. Look for SQL queries that directly incorporate this parameter without using prepared statements, parameterized queries, or input sanitization functions such as mysqli_real_escape_string or PDO::prepareAffected if The transactioncode parameter is used directly in SQL queries without prepared statements or escaping
-
Confirm the application is network-accessibleVerify that the web application is accessible over HTTP/HTTPS. Test accessing the page via browser or curl: curl -I http://TARGET_HOST/path/to/cashconfirm.phpAffected if The application is reachable remotely, allowing external attackers to send malicious transactioncode values
Your environment is affected if you are running Carmelo Simple Pizza Ordering System version 1.0 with the cashconfirm.php file accessible remotely and the transactioncode parameter used in unsanitized SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements for the transactioncode parameter; apply vendor patches if available; validate and sanitize all user inputs.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-6359 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-6359 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data